Hi Nathan, There seem to have been a few emails since this, in particular ones from Alan Gray. As Alan has said, my problem is more with the way people interpret LandXML data, than with the actual schema documentation itself. The idea of a list of features supported by different vendors would be very beneficial to us, however my concern is wider than this. For example when dealing with CoordGeom elements, our software prefers Chains to IrregularLines. The confusion I had with the InRoads file involved how best to handle line work. - Breaklines, PlanFeatures or Chains all being valid options, but I had no idea which was best. - Breaklines was the answer this time -Thankyou to Richard for helping there :) You spoke about publishing feature directories on LandXML.org. This would be great, but I'd like the extra information mentioned above as well!!! Realistically, do you have a time table for when this may be implemented? I suspect you have enough other things to do though.... Regards, Hugh Dixon > -----Original Message----- > From: Nathan Crews [mailto:nathan.crews@xxxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Wednesday, 14 December 2005 1:38 AM > To: Hugh Dixon; landxml@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: RE: [LandXML] Re: LandXML - Bentley/In Roads > > Hi Hugh, > > The good news is we are working on improving the LandXML > schema documentation for LandXML-1.1. This will include 1.0 > and will be available by April 2006. In the mean time if you > have any specific questions, please ask and one of us will be > able to get you an answer. > > LandXML Registered Software > > This is one of the best practical methods we use. During the > software registration process the submitted (and required) > sample LandXML files are validated and tested in several > applications. The results are sent back to the applicant for > correction or posted if no errors are found. > > Once registered and listed, we publish the sample LandXML > files which can then be used for testing. > > Regards, > > Nathan --snip--