[LandXML] FW: Re: LandXML - Bentley/In Roads
- From: "Hugh Dixon" <hugh.dixon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <landxml@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 10:43:43 +1100
Michael,
It's that first sentence that gets me! (Although in that
respect I am very much a "pot calling the kettle black") From
a basic foundation it does seem that the conversion process
is an iterative process.
I guess I had best accept that, and get on with it.
Thanks for your comments,
Good luck with the new software!
Hugh
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Ostertag, Michael [mailto:mostertag@xxxxxx]
> > Sent: Tuesday, 20 December 2005 1:09 AM
> > To: Hugh Dixon
> > Subject: RE: [LandXML] Re: LandXML - Bentley/In Roads
> >
> > Hugh--
> >
> > First of all, I got the vendors to give me which elements they
> > supported and in which way they intended to use the
> elements (I wish
> > they would post this to their websites).
> > Secondly, by using VBA and style sheets, we would read the XML File
> > and write it the database in question. Third, we would reverse the
> > process.
> >
> > This would totally by pass the internal parsers and give us full
> > control of the LandXML elements. I guess that we looked at the
> > elements and data in the XML file and determined the
> intent, changed
> > it in VBA as necessary and then wrote it to the database. It took
> > some time, but we finally wade through it. Clincher is, we
> have to do
> > it again...we changed software.
> >
> > I hope this helps some.
> >
> > michael
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Hugh Dixon [mailto:hugh.dixon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> > Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2005 2:12 PM
> > To: Ostertag, Michael
> > Subject: RE: [LandXML] Re: LandXML - Bentley/In Roads
> >
> >
> > Thanks Michael, you are confirming what I feel.
> > You say you have used VBA, and changed your operating
> procedures, to
> > "massage" the data.
> > Can you tell us how you found out in what way the data needed
> > "massaging"?
> > i.e. I'm guessing you have 'decoded' the way the software you use
> > interprets the LandXML file.
> > It is how you got that information that interests me....
> >
> >
> > Hugh Dixon
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Ostertag, Michael [mailto:mostertag@xxxxxx]
> > > Sent: Friday, 16 December 2005 2:23 AM
> > > To: Hugh Dixon
> > > Subject: RE: [LandXML] Re: LandXML - Bentley/In Roads
> > >
> > > I have not used LandXML too much to exchange data between
> different
> > > programs, but believe that it may be necessary to develop
> your own
> > > style sheets to "massage" the data to desired results. I
> > believe this
> > > is due not necessarily to the to LandXML or the programs
> being used
> > > but to the slight variations in procedures by the
> > individuals and what
> > > data they find necessary to them.
> > >
> > > I have been able to exchange raw and processed data between
> > programs,
> > > but without some customization, we will not be able to
> > exchange point
> > > attribute information (TDS Attribute file).
> > > Some of what we have done is through VBA and some to
> > modifications of
> > > procedures.
> > >
> > > Even if LandXML Standards are excepted by both programs, there is
> > > still interpolation of the exact meaning of each element.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Michael C Ostertag, CE IV
> > > Montana Department of Transportation Missoula Construction PO Box
> > > 7039 MISSOULA MT 59807-7039
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: landxml-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > [mailto:landxml-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Hugh Dixon
> > > Sent: Monday, December 12, 2005 5:27 PM
> > > To: landxml@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > Subject: [LandXML] Re: LandXML - Bentley/In Roads
> > >
> > >
> > > Thankyou all for your assistance with this.
> > > The core problem however remains. We are trying to map
> > objects from
> > > out data structures into LandXML elements/attributes, and
> then into
> > > another product.
> > > How we do our mapping, naturally, makes perfect sense to us
> > > :) There seems to be some confusion (on our and our users
> > > part) when the second mapping is applied with data either
> > not being as
> > > expected, or disappearing totally.
> > >
> > > I believe that LINZ, a major LandXML user, provides a document
> > > detailing what parts of LandXML they support, and how they
> > interpret
> > > it.
> > > Has there been any move to encourage software
> > providers/developers to
> > > supply this sort of information to the wider community?
> > > We do have this information available, although I suspect
> it may be
> > > difficult to find, and may not be particularly clear.
> > > Does anyone else see a need for this information to be readily
> > > available, and has anyone thought about a suitable format?
> > >
> > > Comments appreciated....
> > >
> > > --
> > > Hugh Dixon
> > > www.liscad.com
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
Other related posts:
