WRT a high-gain antenna. It sounds like you're on a budget - I've seen a couple of projects where people have converted DirecTV/Dish/Primestar dishes to high-gain directional antennas. If you're in a neighborhood where people are moving frequently, you can bet there's a couple sitting in garages waiting for the next yard sale. You might give that a try - I'd be curious to hear your results. http://www.wwc.edu/~frohro/Airport/Primestar/Primestar.html is a pretty good link, Google's got plenty more. On Mon, 17 May 2004 10:09:54 +0200, Brad Knowles <brad.knowles@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > At 8:52 AM +0100 2004/05/17, Ian Beeby wrote: > > > In many administrations, there is a fixed maximum effective radiated > > power for 802.11 systems, and this is calculated by taking the power > > output of the transmitter, subtracting the feeder and connector loss > > and adding the antenna gain. > > Keep in mind that this varies greatly by country, region, etc.... > If you don't know what the EIRP limits are in your area, before you > go playing around with high-gain antennas you should talk to local > ham radio operators and experienced wireless network operators to > find out what the limits are. The last thing you want is to have a > complaint filed against you for causing interference, and run the > risk of possible criminal and civil action. > > Here, the US is much less limited than Europe. In the US, with > clear line-of-sight and good high-gain antennas on both ends, you can > legally get distances of 50-75km or more. In Europe, it can be > difficult to get more than 10-20km. Carefully choosing your wireless > cards (on both ends) so as to have maximum sensitivity can help a > great deal. > > > So if you have a manufactured system > > with 20dBm eirp (effective isotropic radiated power) and replace > > the 7dB antenna with a 20dB one you'll strictly need to reduce the > > power output of the transmitter by 13dB - by a software setting or > > by adding more feeder loss. > > Keep in mind that many manufactured systems are shipped with an > EIRP that is significantly *below* the maximum allowed for that area. > At issue here is not what is shipped, but what the total maximums are > in your area and how different aspects of the overall system may need > to be modified to stay under them. > > > Sorry that this was a bit off topic. > > I don't think it was off-topic at all. I think it was a very > good message, which delivered a lot of useful information. > > -- > Brad Knowles, <brad.knowles@xxxxxxxxx> > > "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary > safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." > -Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania. > > SAGE member since 1995. See <http://www.sage.org/> for more info. > >