Does this mean that we can find Hidden SSIDs? On Thursday, April 10, 2003, at 04:48 PM, Michael Rossberg wrote: > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > >> How hard would it be to make those changes? > > it was working already. it is just a bug, that the ssid does not stay > there. consider it fixed. > > mick > > >> On Thursday, April 10, 2003, at 12:05 AM, Bob Cunningham wrote: >> >>> >>> I'll admit to using the technique described in the article to hide >>> the SSID for several access points I've install. And -- with >>> KisMAC -- I've seen other access points configured that way. >>> >>> [Why? As the article points out, not broadcasting the SSID >>> (i.e., removing it from BEACON packets) is not really secure. >>> However, it does a little something discourage casual users. >>> And not all access points can be configured to do it.] >>> >>> But frankly, I don't think KisMAC needs to "go active" in >>> order to discover SSIDs which are hidden this way. >>> >>> When I monitor an access point set up that way with >>> KisMAC what I see most of the time is a blank SSID. >>> However, if I monitor a busy access point for long enough, >>> the SSID will occasionally show. Only to vanish again quickly. >>> Literally, "in the blink of an eye". >>> >>> I haven't found the logic behind that in the source code yet, >>> but what I think happens is that while SSIDs are being >>> suppressed in the beacons ... occasionally an ASSOCIATE >>> or REASSOCIATE frame shows up. Which does have the >>> SSID. KisMAC seems to (correctly) display that, but it quickly >>> goes away. Probably because a beacon packet (without >>> the SSID) shows up. >>> >>> Perhaps if the logic want changed so that: >>> >>> If an SSID shows up in in an ASSOCIATE or >>> REASSOCIATE packet, display it. >>> >>> if BEACON packets show up afterwards with >>> zero length SSID, do not change the display. >>> >>> ... in other words: if a non-zero-length SSID shows up, >>> keep displaying it. Even if subsequent BEACON frames >>> from that access point have zero-length SSIDs. >>> >>> >>> >>> On Wednesday, Apr 9, 2003, at 12:43 Pacific/Honolulu, Robbie Miller >>> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> I think the next release of kismac should include the ability to >>>> discover the name of hidden SSIDs. >>>> http://www.tisc2002.com/newsletters/416.html >>>> I have found this document, some of the options on the site would >>>> cause >>>> the Kismac to reveal it's self. >>>> So in my opinion I think that there should be a menu option to make >>>> kismac attempt to discover the SSID. >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >> >> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (Darwin) > > iD8DBQE+lea06ssxlS0dtH4RAqqbAJ95QBdf418bIpfkpU24ZFTWthuBawCbBmBa > jIpA1LlzDwf9GqaUx6wPhx4= > =bNC8 > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > >