[kismac] Re: KisMAC 0.05f

  • From: Michael Rossberg <mick@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: kismac@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 02:25:44 +0200

>       I also like the ability to average the signal strength over a
> variable period of time, from 2 to 300 seconds.  However, I would
> prefer to exclude zeros from that average, so that we only average
> values where we had something to measure.

ok... next release...

>       Now, some problems.
>       I have an Aiport and a Senao SL2511CD-PLUS in this PowerBook G4.
> I have two Airport base stations downstairs (one set up in bridging
> mode only, the other set up to bridge/route/NAT/DHCP/etc....  With
> 0.05e, I could be scanning with my Senao while flood pinging my two
> aiport stations from two separate terminal windows.  With 0.05f, I
> can sniff traffic with my Senao, but I can't generate any traffic
> with my Airport card, otherwise KisMac wedges and I get a spinning
> beachball, which means I have to force-quite KisMac to do anything
> else.
>       Overall, this is a significant improvement over 0.05e.  Once we
> can get the beachball problems solved, I'd happy to move forward with
> using this as my starting point for the wireless signal strength
> article I had previously mentioned.

Looks like a deadlock... I ll be out hunting....


p.s. make yourselves prepared for pseudojack... the driver which is 
none ;-)

Other related posts: