[kismac] Re: Growl Links Not Maintained by SVN
- From: "John Warren" <xaive1@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: kismac@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 14:47:07 -0800
Are you talking about a wordlist file. If so i have one that is 30
megs that has about 3 million words. I don't remeber where i got it,
but I could supply it to you if you are interested.
On 3/2/06, Geoffrey Kruse <gkruse@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I take back my statement, with the fixed code, altivec is about 2.5 x as
> fast. I will be committing the fix shortly, thanks for looking. Intel will
> default to the non accelerated code until we can find replacements for
> vec_step and vec_rl. It seems the ppc is better for rc5 type cracking
> because it has hardware rotate that the intel does not.
>
> Geoff
>
> P.S. Do you know of a good password dictionary?
>
>
>
> On Mar 2, 2006, at 2:46 PM, Erik Winkler wrote:
> In the past, the altivec code was much faster when comparing a G3 to a G4 of
> similar speeds.
>
> Erik
>
>
> On Mar 2, 2006, at 4:23 PM, Geoffrey Kruse wrote:
>
> On Mar 2, 2006, at 2:07 PM, Erik Winkler wrote:
> Geoff,
>
> Found the WPA problem. I replaced all occurrences of vL128Rotate with
> vec_rl in the file WaveNetWPACrackAltivec.m. Not sure why you were using
> vL128Rotate.
>
> I will take a look... I was using vL128Rotate because there is vec_rl is not
> defined for i386;
>
> My initial benchmarking also shows that the non altivec version is faster,
> but I'll get back to you on that.
>
> Geoff
>
>
>
>
> WPA Crack works fine now.
>
> Erik
> On Mar 2, 2006, at 10:20 AM, Geoffrey Kruse wrote:
>
>
> On Mar 2, 2006, at 5:46 AM, Erik Winkler wrote:
>
>
> The build is flawless now. That did the trick. WPA cracking still broken.
> May want to look at any changes made to the WPA code to make it i386
> compatible. I will compare an older version of the WPA code to the new code
> when I get a chance.
>
>
>
> The code is i386 compatible, its just not executed on i386 because of a
> check for alttvec before the code is called. What I need to debug: A dump
> with a WPA net that can be cracked using r90 or earlier but fails with the
> new code. The only dump I have at the moment does not crack using r90 or
> earlier. This vectorized code is pretty far outside my understanding, I
> directly translated it function call for function call. If you get a chance
> take a look at Crypto/WaveNetWPACrackAltivec.m. The other
> alternative would be to #ifdef out all of the code for i386 and change it
> back to the way it was. This would however leave us without an mmx / sse
> version of this crack.
>
> Geoff
>
>
>
>
>
Other related posts:
