[kismac] Re: Aircrack
- From: "Michael Payne" <adese0@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: kismac@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2007 16:39:59 -0400
I often use a combo of kismac and aircrack. (aircrack complies well on osx,
just make sure to replace the original makefile with the makefile.osx)
Since kismac will divy up the capture files between scans (assuming you have
to start and stop your scan often) I use mergecap (included when you install
wireshark) in terminal to merge all the files together. you can also use
ivstools included with aircrack-ng which will take your dumps and convert
them to straight ivs files. note that aircrack-ng 0.9.1 does not support
PTW attack on .ivs files YET.
kismac and aircrack-ng are a good marriage
2007/8/8, John Warren <xaive1@xxxxxxxxx>:
>
> Well I'm scanning a network right now and I just collected packets
> instead of trying the frag attack. I've got 10074 IV's as of right
> now, so the network is giving off IV's. I'm wondering if something
> isn't working with my injection.
>
> On 7/27/07, Steven Walt <stevenwalt@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Basically, it uses a different attack - ptw attack. It is much more
> > efficient (it needs way less ivs). For example, I have cracked 64bit
> with
> > 15,000 ivs and 128bit with 65,000 ivs. I don't know about capturing with
> > kismac and using aircrack though. What I do (it works VERY well):
> >
> > Instead of using Kismac (which only works on b networks), on my macbook
> I
> > have vmware fusion. You can download a special pre-made vm full of the
> > aircrack suite. I bought a WUSB54GC and installed it's driver... it
> works
> > very well in vmware and I can even use the fragmentation attack (when
> > there's no clients). BTW this setup works for b and g networks... My
> video
> > for this:
> >
> > Fragmentation attack with airoscript [low quality BUT explained
> (youtube) ]
> > Fragmentation attack with airoscript [ high quality AND explanation
> (stage
> > 6)] – best bet
> > Fragmentation attack with airoscript [ super high quality BUT NO
> > explanation (stage 6)]
> >
> >
> > Any questions - stevenwalt@xxxxxxxxx
> >
> >
> > On 7/27/07, I. R. C. <ma111v1@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > Thanks Easy B,
> > >
> > > Kismac is great, but for 104 bit cracking Kismac takes forever - and
> > > according to this
> > >
> > http://www.security-hacks.com/2007/04/27/aircrack-ptw-wep-cracking-tool
> > -
> > > aircrack does it fast. Why the difference?
> > >
> > >
> > > >From: Easy B <easy-b@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > >Reply-To: kismac@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > >To: kismac@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > >Subject: [kismac] Re: Aircrack
> > > >Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 13:11:04 +0200
> > > >
> > > >Hi
> > > >
> > > >Aircrack compiles fine on Mac OS X. There's a Makefile included that
> > only
> > > >builds the working apps (use -f option for make).
> > > >As far as I know Kismac already uses airkrack for cracking though.
> > > >
> > > >Cheers,
> > > >Ezra.
> > > >
> > > >On 27.07.2007, at 12:40, I. R. C. wrote:
> > > >
> > > >>Hello,
> > > >>
> > > >>I want to use Aircrack on Kismac data. Is there a Mac version of
> > > >>Aircrack? How do I do it?
> > > >>
> > > >>Thanks
> > > >>
> > >
> > >>_________________________________________________________________
> > > >>http://imagine-windowslive.com/hotmail/?locale=en-
> > > >>us&ocid=TXT_TAGHM_migration_HM_mini_2G_0507
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > >
> > http://im.live.com/messenger/im/home/?source=hmtextlinkjuly07
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
Other related posts:
