David, I ran the Linksys diag. disk on the problem computer and it shows... "IRQ255 PortA400 (this IRQ seems a bit odd)" "Configuration test Pass" "I/O test (gets stuck here...computer just makes a continuous beep tone until I turn it off)" Assuming the I/O radio button in 'view resources' is what this refers to, I see... "1000 - 10FF Linksys" in this list. What does this mean? Thanks Kurt http://www.myildportal.com ref #: 1827854, pass: guest ----- Original Message ----- From: "David M. Dodge" <daviddodge1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: <kegswindows@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Saturday, July 06, 2002 9:39 AM Subject: [kegswindows] Re: configuring network > > Kurt, > That should be where you assign IRQ's to cards in those slots. For the > Netgear card, setting one of these might have worked. Usually PCI cards > self negotiate the IRQ level and resolve conflicts during the POST process. > David > > -----Original Message----- > From: kegswindows-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:kegswindows-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Kurt Mincin > Sent: Friday, July 05, 2002 10:41 PM > To: kegswindows@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [kegswindows] Re: configuring network > > > > > David, I thought the following information would be useful to help me > configure my network... > > In BIOS there's the Advanced tab which has the PCI configuration option. On > the PCI page there's > Slot 1 [auto] > Slot 2 [auto] > Slot 3 [auto] > Slot 4/5 [auto] > > Do these IRQs correspond to the ones in Device Manager? > I have the NIC card in slot 2. > > Thanks > Kurt > http://www.myildportal.com > ref #: 1827854, pass: guest > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "David M. Dodge" <daviddodge1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > To: <kegswindows@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 7:46 AM > Subject: [kegswindows] Re: configuring network > > > > > > Kurt, > > sounds like the Netgear NICs want to use a specific IRQ and it must be > > dedicated to the slot. you will have to go into BIOS and try to set a > > specific slot. If the board isn't that old, you may be able to do this, > > otherwise get another NIC like an Intel or 3Com, I have had good luck > with > > Linksys and they are a bit cheaper than the intel and 3com NICs. We have > > had some problems with system config and Netgear cards where we couldn't > get > > them on the network and nothing we did worked. some folks have had no > > problems though, so it may be highly hardware dependent. It sounds like > the > > Netgear folks are giving you the right info. Each vendor has their own > > specific policy regarding sales. My guess is that HDNW can build PCs but > > the techs are not knowledgable about networking and can't figure out how > to > > set up a NIC and check it out to make sure it works. Supporting > networking > > is not easy as so many different things can cause problems as you are now > > discovering. > > > > David > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: kegswindows-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > [mailto:kegswindows-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Kurt Mincin > > Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 12:00 AM > > To: kegswindows@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Subject: [kegswindows] Re: configuring network > > > > > > > > > > David, I got a reply email from Netgear in which he says to "check with a > > hardware vendor to assign a free IRQ of either 9, 10, or 11 to the PCI > slot > > where the NIC is being installed." I got the cards from Hard Drives NW, > > but they said that they don't support networking. I emailed a reply to > > Netgear tonight about this, but I wanted to ask you about it also. It > seems > > a bit odd to not support something that you sell, but I bought all my > > components for the computer from there because of the 1 year warranty. > > > > Anyway, do these IRQ settings sound right? Also, are the IRQs in Device > > Manager the same as those in BIOS? > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "David M. Dodge" <daviddodge1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > To: <kegswindows@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Sent: Sunday, June 30, 2002 9:53 AM > > Subject: [kegswindows] Re: configuring network > > > > > > > > > > Kurt, > > > > > > That's a good indicator of machine problems. when yoiu move the "bad > > card" > > > to another machine and it behaves normally and the "good card" becomes > bad > > > in the other machine is a very good indicator of card chassis > > > incompatability. I would check the BIOS on the suspect machine to see > if > > it > > > has any network settings that may conflict or that it is restricting or > > > locking down the IRQ's on the PCI slots for legacy hardware. You may > have > > > to get another brand of NIC to try and see if that is an issue. Without > > > benching the two together and seeing how they react, it cold be a > > > combination of hardware and software in settings for both. Tough to > tell, > > > you now know that both cards are good, now you need to investigate why > the > > > one PC works with a NIC and the other one doesn't. > > > Good Luck, > > > > > > David > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: kegswindows-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > [mailto:kegswindows-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Kurt Mincin > > > Sent: Saturday, June 29, 2002 10:08 PM > > > To: kegswindows@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > Subject: [kegswindows] Re: configuring network > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > David, if I can switch NIC cards between computers and the diagnostics > on > > > > > machine A remains ok (displays card stats), while on machine B the > > > diagnostics still displays an error, doesn't that mean that there's > > > something wrong with machine B itself? > > > > > > On the problem computer I did move the card to another PCI slot and > still > > > got a diagnostic error. > > > > > > Kurt > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "David M. Dodge" <daviddodge1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > To: <kegswindows@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > Sent: Friday, June 28, 2002 5:42 PM > > > Subject: [kegswindows] Re: configuring network > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Kurt, > > > > I would move the card to another PCI slot and if you get the same > error > > on > > > > the diagnostics, then the card has problems. The other thing to check > is > > > to > > > > see if both cards are set to full duplex. Are both cards the same > brand > > > and > > > > are they both 10/100? you may have a bad PCI slot or there is a PCI > > > > conflict. You may want to make sure in bios that you have not > reserved > > > all > > > > the pci slots to ISA just in case. If the diagnostic utility can't see > > the > > > > NIC then you ought to try another card altogether. You can get NIC's > > for > > > > aroung $20 so that shouln't kill the finances. If the card is new, > then > > > get > > > > a replacement at the store where you bought it. > > > > > > > > David > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: kegswindows-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > [mailto:kegswindows-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Kurt Mincin > > > > Sent: Friday, June 28, 2002 8:34 AM > > > > To: kegswindows@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > Subject: [kegswindows] Re: configuring network > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > David, I tried the diagnostic/driver diskette on both machines. The > > > machine > > > > that displays "response timed out" from pinging also gets a diagnostic > > > error > > > > that the network adapter is not found. The machine that displays a > > reply > > > > from pinging also lists the stats of the adapter, which I assume means > > > it's > > > > ok. On the problem machine with diagnostic error it says to: > > > > > > > > 1) check that there's a card installed > > > > 2) check that the PCI configuration in BIOS is set, otherwise... > > > > 3) switch adapter cards to see if the machine is the problem > > > > > > > > I still get the diagnostic error. I'm not sure what to do next. > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > Kurt > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > From: "David M. Dodge" <daviddodge1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > To: <kegswindows@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 10:17 PM > > > > Subject: [kegswindows] Re: configuring network > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Kurt, > > > > > If you get a response from one side, the cable and network cards are > > ok. > > > > > You should be able to get another from the other side. What are > your > > IP > > > > > addresses and subnet masks you are using for each computer? Are you > > > using > > > > > Fixed IP addresses or is the address being automatically given to > one > > or > > > > > both computers? Have you enabled internet connection sharing? If > > you > > > > got > > > > > a complete response with the address and got a time (ie 10ms) for > the > > > ping > > > > > with a 100% packet success rate, you should have a good connection > and > > > the > > > > > addresses are on the same subnet. I would run the diagnosic program > > > that > > > > > came with the network card on the computer that keeps getting a > > response > > > > > timed out, may have an issue. but the one that is getting the > > successful > > > > > ping may not be responding to a ping and therefore may be the > problem > > > NIC. > > > > > > > > > > David > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > From: kegswindows-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > > [mailto:kegswindows-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Kurt Mincin > > > > > Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 8:22 PM > > > > > To: kegswindows@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > > Subject: [kegswindows] Re: configuring network > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > David, thanks. I enabled file and print sharing and it got me a bit > > > > > further, but still not there. Each computer's Network Neighborhood > > now > > > > > shows 'entire network' (as before) and the computer itself (which it > > was > > > > not > > > > > before), but still not the other computer. When pinging, one > computer > > > > gets > > > > > a reply, the other gets 'response timed out'. I might add that it's > > the > > > > new > > > > > computer displaying 'response timed out'. > > > > > > > > > > The WOWN site says that it's most likely a hardware issue, but both > > > > network > > > > > cards are working according to device manager in the system > > properties. > > > I > > > > > don't know how to test the cable. > > > > > > > > > > I hope that's clear > > > > > Thanks again > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > > From: "David M. Dodge" <daviddodge1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > To: <kegswindows@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 5:25 PM > > > > > Subject: [kegswindows] Re: configuring network > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Kurt, > > > > > > Do you have File and print sharing enabled on both computers, if > > not, > > > > then > > > > > > youy won't see anything as the netbios stack won't be loaded, > which > > is > > > > > what > > > > > > you need to see the other system. > > > > > > David Dodge > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > > From: kegswindows-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > > > [mailto:kegswindows-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Kurt Mincin > > > > > > Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 2:20 PM > > > > > > To: KEGS (Windows) SIG > > > > > > Subject: [kegswindows] configuring network > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > OK. I've two computers, both with WIN98, Netgear Network > Interface > > > Card > > > > > in > > > > > > each, a 25' CAT5 Crossover cable. When I double-click on the > > Network > > > > > > Neighborhood, then Entire Network, I get "unable to browse > network". > > > I > > > > > > called Netgear and they gave me some websites for reference. I > used > > > > > > www.wown.com to configure the tcp/ip > netgear protocol and the IP > > > > address > > > > > > that the site recommends. They suggest testing the connection > using > > > > PING. > > > > > > From one system I got "request timed out". From the other system > I > > > got > > > > > > "destination host unreachable". For the "unreachable" error the > > site > > > > says > > > > > > to check the gateway address because the other system is not on > the > > > same > > > > > > subnet. I tried the gateway address given on the site and got the > > > > > > "destination host unreachable" error again. > > > > > > > > > > > > Can anyone help me to get these computers talking? > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > Kurt Mincin > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >