[KACT] Re: Opinions on length of term for officers
- From: Jim Cera <jcera@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: kact@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2005 11:05:01 -0500
Annual election would be good and biennial conference election every
other year seems best.
--JCera
Deters, Kelly wrote:
>I've set up the ListServ for KACT and subscribed all the people that had =
>an interest in helping to plan the group...once the group officially =
>begins I'll add everyone that joins.
>
>After more thought to the 2-year term that I suggested originally (to =
>provide continuity for the biennial conference), a 2 year term as =
>president-elect followed by a 2 year term as president followed by a 2 =
>year term as past president would result in a 6 year comittment on the =
>part of anyone choosing to be president...this seems like an awfully =
>long time to commit (the other offices didn't have this problem, just =
>president because of the "elect" and "past" offices). Would it be =
>better to have all officers elected annually and then have a officer =
>dedicated to the biennal conference that is elected every other year =
>after each conference is held? What's your thoughts?
>
>Kelly
>
>To post to the mailing list, send email to kact@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>To unsubscribe, change your settings or to search the archives, visit
>//www.freelists.org/list/kact
>
>
>
>
To post to the mailing list, send email to kact@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe, change your settings or to search the archives, visit
//www.freelists.org/list/kact
Other related posts:
