[KACT] Opinions on length of term for officers
- From: "Deters, Kelly" <DetersK@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <kact@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2005 09:08:12 -0500
I've set up the ListServ for KACT and subscribed all the people that had =
an interest in helping to plan the group...once the group officially =
begins I'll add everyone that joins.
After more thought to the 2-year term that I suggested originally (to =
provide continuity for the biennial conference), a 2 year term as =
president-elect followed by a 2 year term as president followed by a 2 =
year term as past president would result in a 6 year comittment on the =
part of anyone choosing to be president...this seems like an awfully =
long time to commit (the other offices didn't have this problem, just =
president because of the "elect" and "past" offices). Would it be =
better to have all officers elected annually and then have a officer =
dedicated to the biennal conference that is elected every other year =
after each conference is held? What's your thoughts?
Kelly
To post to the mailing list, send email to kact@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe, change your settings or to search the archives, visit
//www.freelists.org/list/kact
Other related posts:
