Here's a snippet from the online Wired Magazine article that I missed before: "One bright spot for free software advocates: Any software that implements the standards must be "based on open source code." Hardware copy-protection schemes can remain proprietary." That makes me wonder how it's supposed to work for software. Any open-source copy protection scheme had better be absolutely bullet-proof. Every 13 year old kid who doesn't want to pay $35 for a DVD will be all over that code. I'm assuming that the quote is saying that the bill will require the copy protection scheme itself to be open-source, not that all software using the copy protection scheme will be open-source. Sadly the text of the bill isn't up yet, so I don't know what exactly has been changed from the text of the SSSCA draft. Cheers, James ------------------------------------ This is the Juneau-LUG mailing list. To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to juneau-lug-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject header.