[jhb_airlines] Re: tips

  • From: Mr Winskill <gwinsk@xxxxxxx>
  • To: <jhb_airlines@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2006 17:45:52 BST

It's a bit of a minefield, since they offer AGP, PCI-E x 16 and PCI-E x 1. Only 
misco show sufficient info as to make it possible to choose the right version. 
Mine now despatched, after checking with Matrox.
 They do indeed seem to have backed out of the Home market and their blurb 
seems to be aimed at the commercial "back office" environment, heavilly into 
multi screen use. The TripleHead was also developed for that market, before 
focussing on gaming outlets.

The fact that the FSX disk doesn't have to be left in the machine is, as I'm 
experiencing at present, a two edged sword. I'd be interested to know what 
proportion of FS9 users fly on line but would imagine it's a minute fraction. 
So, they'll have the inconvenience of having to connect to the net, just to 
activate FSX. In my case, if not interested in MP, I'd definitely not connect 
the new machine to the net.

I read yesterday that MS have now ceased to support un SP2 updated Windows XP. 
In the past I've not belonged to the anti MS brigade but they seem, 
increasingly, to be acting out the part of the archtypal monopolist supplier. 

Gerry Winskill

Bones <bones@xxxxxxx> wrote :

> Just check that Matrox data again. The G550 was the Millennium card that
> came out some time ago and replaced the G500. It was originally available in
> PCI and AGP versions.
> Maybe the PCI-E version is new and updated but I'd heard that Matrox were
> stepping away from the non professional market.
> Andrew Herd has written a good article on FSX which is worth reading. There
> are a couple of significant points - one being that the new sim now relies
> far more on the graphics card rather than the brute power of the CPU. The
> second is that you don't need a CD in the drive to use FSX as it is
> activated online like Win XP. It also will not run on any Windows version
> except Vista and XP2 - apparently not on an unpatched version of XP.
> bones
> -----Original Message-----
> From: jhb_airlines-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:jhb_airlines-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> On Behalf Of Mr Winskill
> Sent: 10 October 2006 10:12
> To: jhb_airlines@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [jhb_airlines] Re: tips
> Back on line and I'd answered the first question in the reply to Frank;
> having just come to your own, after.
> System on the new one is:
> Mobo            ASUS P5B
> Processor       INTEL CORE 2 DUO E6700 (2 X 2.67GHZ) 1066MHZ FSB/4MB Cache
> Graphics Card   256Mb Geforce 7600GT PCI-Express + DVI + TV Out
> Memory          2048 Mb CORSAIR DDR2-667 PCS300
> Hard Drive      SATA II 250Gb @ 7200rpm, 8Mb Cache
> Hard Drive 2    SATA 11  80Gb @ 7200 rpm, just transferred from my old
> machine.
> Initial economies were on memory and the graphics card. If FSX dictates, and
> cash available, I'll increase to 4096 Mb. On Shep's advice I went for the
> 7600GT, initially. The top end card was about £300 extra! He thinks prices
> will plummet when DirectX X comes out and new cards have to be produced to
> use it.
> Only significant hitch, so far, apart from not being able to get on line
> with anything but this laptop, is second graphics card. The new machine
> won't recognise either of my old PCI cards. Getting decent information is
> extremely difficult but it looks as though a PCI-Express card will only run
> with others of that conformation. Whilst doing a trawl I came across news of
> Matrox having launced the 550. This is PCI-E x 1, so I have three of those
> slots available, as well as three PCI. The icing on the cake is that the 550
> looks to be a genuine dual head, like my much missed Matrox 400 Dual Head
> AGP; stil languishing in a drawer.
> Gerry Winskil
> Bones &lt;bones@xxxxxxx&gt;
> wrote :
> &gt; Yep - but what happens when you re-enable the second processor as
> &gt; suggested?
> &gt;
> &gt; Whilst you are here can you give us a rundown on your current system
> &gt; now?
> &gt;
> &gt; CPU
> &gt; Mobo
> &gt; Graphics card
> &gt; memory
> &gt; hard drive
> &gt;
> &gt; bones
> &gt;
> &gt; -----Original Message-----
> &gt; From: jhb_airlines-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> &gt; [mailto:jhb_airlines-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> &gt; On Behalf Of Mr Winskill
> &gt; Sent: 09 October 2006 22:29
> &gt; To: jhb_airlines@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> &gt; Subject: [jhb_airlines] Re: tips
> &gt;
> &gt;
> &gt; Frank,
> &gt; I've had a quick look at the first, CPU related, suggestion. In
> &gt; untouched state, with both processors ticked, CPU Useage is 54%, one
> &gt; processor burbling just below max and the other burbling along just
> &gt; above the baseline. FPS is about 57, at Ronaldsway.
> &gt;
> &gt; With only one processor ticked, CPU Useage is down to 51%. One
> &gt; processor is a straight line at max, the other barely discernible
> &gt; above baseline and fps probably about 2 to 3 lower than in the first
> &gt; situation.
> &gt;
> &gt;
> &gt; The Default was both running with FS9, which was producing marginally
> &gt; beter framerates.
> &gt;
> &gt; Brighter brains than mine my deduce something from this.
> &gt;
> &gt; Can't look at the effect of FSUIPC on blurries, since my version seems
> &gt; to have become unregistered, at some stage.
> &gt;
> &gt; Gerry Winskill
> &gt;
> &gt; Franklyn Fisher &amp;lt;ff006c5886@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx&amp;gt;
> &gt; wrote :
> &gt;
> &gt; &amp;gt; I don't know if this will be of any use to you, but have just
> &gt; found &amp;gt; it. &amp;amp;gt; &amp;amp;gt; DualCore Processors &amp;gt;
> &amp;amp;gt;
> &gt; &amp;gt; &amp;amp;gt; Start FS in windowed mode.
> &gt; &amp;gt; &amp;amp;gt; Press CTRL+ALT+DEL to get the task manager, click
> performance
> &gt; tab,
> &gt; and
> &gt; &amp;gt; &amp;amp;gt; observe that FS is only using one processor.
> &gt; &amp;gt; &amp;amp;gt; The left graph will show a heavy load, the right a
> light
> load.
> &gt; &amp;gt; &amp;amp;gt; Click on processes, and look for FS9.exe, and
> select
> Infinity.
> &gt; Remove
> &gt;
> &gt; &amp;gt; &amp;amp;gt; the check mark from one processor.
> &gt; &amp;gt; &amp;amp;gt; Close the window and then repeat the process, and
> select
> &gt; both processors &amp;gt;
> &gt; &amp;gt; &amp;amp;gt; again.
> &gt; &amp;gt; &amp;amp;gt; FS9 will now spread the load over the 2
> processors.
> &gt; &amp;gt; &amp;amp;gt;
> &gt; &amp;gt; &amp;amp;gt; Or search the Microsoft Support for Dual core hot
> fix.
> &gt; &amp;gt; &amp;amp;gt;
> &gt; &amp;gt; &amp;amp;gt;
> &gt; &amp;gt; &amp;amp;gt; Blurries
> &gt; &amp;gt; &amp;amp;gt;
> &gt; &amp;gt; &amp;amp;gt; ie textures not loading fast enough
> &gt; &amp;gt; &amp;amp;gt; Check your visibility settings in the registered
> version of
> &gt; FSUIPC.
> &gt; &amp;gt; &amp;amp;gt;
> &gt; &amp;gt; &amp;amp;gt; Hope this will be of help, or you already know
> this.
> &gt; &amp;gt; &amp;amp;gt;
> &gt; &amp;gt; &amp;amp;gt; Frank F
> &gt;
> &gt; ___________________________________
> &gt; NOCC, http://nocc.sourceforge.net
> ___________________________________
> NOCC, http://nocc.sourceforge.net

NOCC, http://nocc.sourceforge.net

Other related posts: