Ah, thanks Bones, my sanity is restored! -----Original Message----- From: jhb_airlines-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:jhb_airlines-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Bones Sent: 04 August 2005 19:54 To: jhb_airlines@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [jhb_airlines] Re: Stornoway approach No - the airfield still only has a LLZ/DME approach. Maybe the designer couldn't install the localiser only and just added the full ILS. In know he has used FSSC for the rebuild but it's a long time since I looked at it. I know ASD had the ability to select no GP but I can't recall if FSSC provides this. Likewise ASD allowed offset ILS's but I don't think any of the other progs did. Hopefully he may change the ILS in the update when he fixes the runway problem. He said he'd received a few emails with suggestions for improvement/amendment and maybe this will be one of them. bones -----Original Message----- From: jhb_airlines-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:jhb_airlines-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Phil Reynolds Sent: 04 August 2005 19:45 To: JHB Subject: [jhb_airlines] Stornoway approach Hi all, I think the grey matter is starting to let me down. Last night I got the relavant charts from the NATS AIS website as usual. These indicate the both runways 18 and 36 have a LLZ/VOR/NDB approach, not a full ILS/DME. As I hadn't installed the addon scenery correctly, this is what I got from the default FS2004 scenery on approach. Tonight however, I have installed the addon scenery correctly and there is now a full ILS/DME approach (on the same frequency as the original VOR used for the DME) which is not documented at all? Is this a new facility at Stornoway for which the charts have not yet been updated? Cheers Phil