[jhb_airlines] Re: Perception of Server Lag

  • From: "Bones" <bones@xxxxxxx>
  • To: <jhb_airlines@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 21:43:56 +0100

So, if we stop using highly complex aircraft with loads of XML gauges,
coupled with FSNav and the VFGM scenery would that reduce the higher
priority loading and speed things up? Taking this further could actual FPS
provide a rough guide as to the potential lag that may occur?

-----Original Message-----
From: jhb_airlines-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:jhb_airlines-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Alex - Reheat.org
Sent: 22 September 2006 21:31
To: jhb_airlines@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [jhb_airlines] Re: Perception of Server Lag


In another project I've been involved in there has been much study done on
the subject of FS an its "Data Pipes" (an SDK term so excuse its use) and
there are many things that can affect it. 

FS data, in and out of multi player sessions is hooked into the FS Engine in
two different ways, first of all there is the ported data, brought in
through direct IP/P2P access such as MP sessions or XML gauges etc directly
into the sim. 

The second is the background process information, such as that brought in
via a plugin module such as Active Sky or another DLL process. 

WideFS and FSUIPC are so successful as they are a mix of the two. An
external module that can take data from .gau/xml or other DLLs and directly
port it through to FS. 

The way that FS gives priority to the data coming from these is not 100%
understood but as a basic rule the it goes: 

Navaids/ GPS Data

There are algorithms in existance that allow the Background data to refresh
doubly as quick as the Ported thus giving superior performance to ported
data but this also, to an extent, relies on porting. 

As Stefan explained it is the FS engines processing of these that causes
lag, the hardware processing the data is limited to the CPU/RAM and HDD.
This is one area of FS that the Video card comes into very little unless the
process is telling FS to "draw" data...which it isn't - it is the MP session
telling FS to do that, which will get reasonably high priority anyway. 

I bet that made no sense at all...perhaps a diagram would have worked


franklyn fisher wrote: 

I wonder if the hardware can also be at fault, for instance 

I have an AMD 64/3200 machine with 1gb ram. 

But my video card is from a previous machine ( an AMD1600/32bit). 

I do realise that the video is holding up my machine, so an upgrade to an
ATI X1600ProAGP from an ATI 9600ProAGP (half the speed) should in theory,
half the queing time, thus the draw to screen must be quicker. Therefore
cutting my server lag? 

Other hardware factors could also contribute, but speeding up the video from
machine thro to the screen must be a benifit. 

Frank F 

Other related posts: