[jhb_airlines] Re: PMDG 737NG

  • From: "Wilding, Colin" <cwilding@xxxxxxxx>
  • To: "'jhb_airlines@xxxxxxxxxxxxx'" <jhb_airlines@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2004 13:10:02 +0100

Hear Hear.  It's been very quiet without you

Colin

-----Original Message-----
From: tom smith [mailto:ftd.smith@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: 13 September 2004 13:09
To: jhb_airlines@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [jhb_airlines] Re: PMDG 737NG


good to here from you I heard  you had taken the airline assist and done a
runner
Tom
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Bones" <bones@xxxxxxx>
To: <jhb_airlines@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, September 13, 2004 1:04 PM
Subject: [jhb_airlines] Re: PMDG 737NG


> That is true and it is a shame the two companies don't seem to be on the
> correct wavelength about this.
>
> GoFlight say they've built their modules to work with all FS commands
> and PMDG say they have only been able to create the true complexities of
> the 737 by modifying some of the FS calls. The result is that the GF
> units don't work as intended with the 737TNG (I don't have the 800
> upgrade). Because of this I haven't really used the 737TNG to any real
> extent after going through the tutorials. However I do agree with Kevin
> in saying that it is a pretty visual aircraft with the real work being
> in fully reproducing the cockpit systems. It is getting very close to
> the 747 PS1 program I used several years ago.
>
> After browsing through the forums at GoFlight, Avsim and PMDG I found a
> couple of threads on a fix for the incompatibility. I have tried this
> and it only partially works for me. For example if I tune the GF
> Autopilot Heading selector it will alter the heading display on the
> aircraft - but it needs two clicks for every degree change. The result
> is that the heading on the GF unit becomes totally different to the one
> on the panel. The same goes for some of the other selectors.
>
> Despite this it is worth considering the 737TNG if you really like
> complex aircraft system releases. Anyone who has enjoyed other "system"
> aircraft like the Milton Shupe Dash 7, Oleksiy Frelov Dash 8 Q300 or FSD
> Panther Navajo would be truly at home with the 737TNG.
>
> Going back into wounded lurk mode...
>
> bones
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: jhb_airlines-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > [mailto:jhb_airlines-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of tom smith
> > Sent: 13 September 2004 11:58
> > To: jhb_airlines@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: [jhb_airlines] Re: PMDG 737NG
> >
> >
> > Gerry
> > only problem is at this time go flight not supported
> > Tom
> > ----- Original Message ----- 
> > From: <gwinsk@xxxxxxx>
> > To: <jhb_airlines@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Monday, September 13, 2004 10:29 AM
> > Subject: [jhb_airlines] Re: PMDG 737NG
> >
> >
> > > Kevin,
> > > Just visted the PMDG site but find there are two B737 options; one
> > > more
> > expensive than
> > > the other. Which is the one you use?
> > >
> > > Gerry Winskill
> > > gwinsk@xxxxxxx
> > >
> > >
> > > On 13 Sep 2004 at 7:54, Kevin Townsend wrote:
> > >
> > > > Phil,
> > > > I use this aircraft almost exclusively within fs2004.
> > > > In my experience it is the most detailed and complex
> > aircraft built
> > > > for FS to date. The team that produced it learned there
> > craft from
> > > > "Fly". If you have ever used this sim, then you will know
> > that the
> > > > cockpit modelling was always streets ahead.
> > > >
> > > > I always get into a dark cockpit and run through the complete
> > > > startup procedures using a checklist (I can let you have
> > this). If
> > > > you wanted a closer look at this try Googling for "737
> > Tutorial by
> > > > Timothy Metzinger" - This will show you the complexity of this
> > > > superb aircraft.
> > > >
> > > > I have updated the base model to add the 800/900 series
> > which also
> > > > adds ACAS. The FMC is true to the Boeing product in all ways.
> > > >
> > > > I have absolutely no hesitation in recommending it to you.
> > > >
> > > > Best wishes
> > > >
> > > > Kev
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > At 20:20 9/7/2004, you wrote:
> > > > >Hi everyone,
> > > > >
> > > > >Does anyone use the PMDG 737NG with FS2004?  If so, what do they
> > > > >generally think of it - good or bad?
> > > > >
> > > > >It looks to me to be a very good all round package, but as with
> > > > >most software it's hard to tell without seeing a demo.
> > > > >
> > > > >Thanks
> > > > >
> > > > >Phil
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>



----------------------------------------------------------------------------

This email and any attachments are sent in confidence, subject to applicable
legal privilege and upon the basis that the recipient will conduct
appropriate virus checks. If you receive this email in error, please 
telephone us upon receipt and delete the email upon our instruction: you 
are strictly prohibited from using, copying or disseminating it or any 
information contained in it,  save  to the intended recipient. Internet 
communications are not secure and HCC Diversified Financial Products Ltd is 
not responsible for their abuse by third parties, nor for any alteration or
corruption in transmission, nor for any damage or loss caused by any virus 
or other defect. Further, HCC Diversified Financial Products Ltd is not 
responsible for the sender's views which are  not necessarily the views of 
HCC Diversified Financial Products Ltd nor for any third party statements 
contained and forwarded in any email communications. No representation or 
warranty is made as to the accuracy or completeness of the content of this 
email and no liability shall be accepted for any loss arising from its use.
*-*


Other related posts: