Given the close proximity of the strips, I think we also need to plan a contingency for the inevitable "server" lag. For most of the session we should all be withn the 40 mile range and that will probably cause a significant build up for some flyers.
Do we:a) fly what we see - ie. if an aircraft is on finals / take-off ahead of us we go around.
orb) fly what we know is current. ie. controllers know the aircraft has cleared the airspace but we are stil seeing it.
My thoughts are for a combination.If the aircraft seen is likely to obstruct you in anyway, go around, otherwise ignore it.
Paul----- Original Message ----- From: "bones" <bones@xxxxxxx>
To: <jhb_airlines@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2007 6:29 PM Subject: [jhb_airlines] Re: PCI Wednesday 18th
The problem with this run is that we have six airfields to cover. After some thought I suggest that the three important airfields to man are St Maartens,St Barts and St Kitts. Frank has the first so I'd like volunteers for St Barts and St Kitts. <g> The original plan to double up isn't feasible except for maybe the St Kitts/Nevis pair. For Saba, St Eustatius and maybe Nevis they will beunmanned but I'll provide traffic information from TTZP (Piarco FIR). We canfine tune this on the night. bones -----Original Message----- From: jhb_airlines-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:jhb_airlines-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of franklyn fisher Sent: 17 July 2007 13:49 To: jhb_airlines@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [jhb_airlines] PCI Wednesday 18thBeen very quite for this, I assume that after everyone has checked out theirscenery, and they want to do the session. Unless otherwise, I will be at TNCM_APP Princess Julianna. Frank F