[jhb_airlines] Re: New Fields

  • From: "Bones" <bones@xxxxxxx>
  • To: <jhb_airlines@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2005 17:49:55 +0100

Things have changed in FS2004. It's a lot harder to make aircraft now with
interaction between panel and MDL files so solo designers have mostly gone,
with a few exceptions. It really is a team effort to make a good aircraft
now - and expectation is higher because there indeed are a lot of good
aircraft around.

Scenery is much the same with users having to get to grips with GMax and XML
rather than play with Airport or FSSC. AFCAD's are the easy way out. For the
majority of users trying to contribute without having to learn a lot of hard
stuff I think AFCAD's and repaints are about the limit.

Says he, just about to tackle yet another repaint.. <g>


-----Original Message-----
From: jhb_airlines-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:jhb_airlines-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Gerry Winskill
Sent: 05 October 2005 17:17
Subject: [jhb_airlines] New Fields

It may be "better to travel hopefully than to arrive" but I like to have
both cake and halfpenny. Arrival is much pleasanter if it's to a field
that isn't defiled by the presence of the Default scenery. Over the last
couple of days I've made four Falcon flights: Woodford to Strasbourg.
Strasbourg to Leeds. Leeds to Mulhouse and Mulhouse to Stansted.
  Object of the exercise was to look at two of the recently dowloaded
package of four French airfields. Still got to look at Nice and Clermont
but the first two are excellent. Definitely the equal of those for which
I've had to part with real money.
 They are available via the Avsim download AIRPAKFR.zip.

BTW, although I initially tried to disable it, I get a daily bulletin on
the new AVSIM files, available for download. Just a personal opinion
that, in contrast to earlier versions of FSim, FS9 third party offerings
are disappointing, being mainly repaints and AI. I wonder why? Of the
scenery offerings most are just AFCADs, with only a small minority
producing decent scenery, of the type I mentioned above.

Gerry Winskill

Other related posts: