You know me - I can be slow in some matters. I agree with what you say - it's a much like IE but without all the stodge. I'm probably going to = keep it and relegate IE to background duties only.. bones -----Original Message----- From: jhb_airlines-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:jhb_airlines-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Mike Lucas Sent: 25 November 2004 18:54 To: jhb_airlines@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [jhb_airlines] Re: Firefox I suppose I'm a little surprised that you've only just discovered = Firefox, John <g> - it's been available in stable form for some time. The Beeb = are a bit behind too. I've been using it for at least a couple of years - = much lighter on its feet than IE, more configurable. Unfortunately you'll = need to keep IE to be able to access some sites which are written in non-standards-compliant code (usually a result of using a MS product) = which requires an equally non-standards-compliant browser. And, of course, = you'll still need IE to be able to get all those MS security fixes. I use Firefox for 99% of any browsing I still do in Windows, and 100% = under Linux. Mike ----- Original Message -----=20 From: "Bones" <bones@xxxxxxx> To: "JHB Email List" <jhb_airlines@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Thursday, November 25, 2004 3:16 PM Subject: [jhb_airlines] Firefox > After an article on the BBC News website yesterday that the new=20 > Mozilla Firefox web browser had received huge support (and accounts=20 > for 5% of all browser use) I thought I'd have a look at it. Download=20 > was 4.7Mb and it installed flawlessly - the only thing to watch being=20 > the message about making it automatically the default browser. No=20 > problem there are IE6 also does this but I wanted to check it out=20 > first. > > In fact I am quite impressed. It's so similar to IE that you might not know > the difference - menus and options are so similar that you can settle=20 > in to > the browser very quickly. I'm going to keep it running for a while. > > HC@xxxxxxxxxx > http://fsaviation.net > > >