[jhb_airlines] Re: FSX Frame Rates

  • From: "Bones" <bones@xxxxxxx>
  • To: <jhb_airlines@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2006 14:23:00 -0000

Not quite the same. In FSX there is a tradeoff between FPS and detail. Some
will want the detail at the expense of FPS and some just the opposite. A
sports car doesn't get prettier if you drive it slowly. <vbg>

bones

-----Original Message-----
From: jhb_airlines-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:jhb_airlines-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Gerry Winskill
Sent: 29 October 2006 11:41
To: jhb_airlines@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [jhb_airlines] Re: FSX Frame Rates


Alastair,
I agree and recall we had exactly this didcussion, after the launch of
FSX and before we upgraded.

One input was to question what would be the reaction to the restriction
of a sports car we'd bought to a manufacturer restriction to "not more
than 30mph".

Gerry Winskill

Alastair wrote:

> Hi Frank,
>
> With all due respect, in that case, what exactly is the point in
> forking out good hard earned money on FSX at the present time, (not
> counting the cost of re-upgrading all the countless numbers of add-ons
> etc)
>
> Alastair
>
> FrankTurley@xxxxxxx wrote:
>
>> I have suddenly got very respectable frame rates for FSX on my old
>> machine, and much faster loading times too. All very simple, just
>> move all sliders to the left! Most of the scenery disappears, but the
>> flight controls respond much more smoothly. It makes FSX flying more
>> tolerable while I wait for Vista, DX10 and my new machine.
>>
>> Frank T.
>>
>>
>
>




Other related posts: