[jhb_airlines] Re: FPI voice

  • From: "Bones" <bones@xxxxxxx>
  • To: <jhb_airlines@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 09:35:30 -0000

That's about it. The good news is that it has been built and has been tested
but we ain't got it. <g>

Anyway, for everyone fed up with this and who would like a treat have a look
at what Dave Maltby's been doing..



-----Original Message-----
From: jhb_airlines-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:jhb_airlines-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Phil Reynolds
Sent: 23 December 2005 09:20
To: jhb_airlines@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [jhb_airlines] Re: FPI voice

Hi Bones,

So it looks to me like what they're saying is that they changed the
servers to only work with a new client which they haven't released.  Not
exactly the best idea they've ever had!!!


Bones wrote:

>No apology from FPI but at least we had a response.
>Their statement is:
>"Hello everybody
>the EU.voice.fpi-net.net is an alias for both the eu-1 and eu-2 (same
>goes for the US,us-1 and us-2)
>Untill we get the packaged Voiceclient from Stefan that supports the
>Alias-feature (It's written, works, just needs to be put into an
>installer) please use the "-1" or "-2"
>Almost clear as mud but I think I see the problem. eu.voice.fpi-net.net
>is a NETWORK address that should be picking up data from two servers -
>eu-1.voice.fpi-net.net and eu-2.voice.fpi-net.net. It isn't quite doing
>this and if you select eu.voice.fpi-net.net it seems to shunt you
>randomly to one of the two servers. For some reason most ATC got
>shunted to eu-1.voice.fpi-net.net and most pilots seem to have gone to
>I'd suggest everyone changes to use eu-1.voice.fpi-net.net and ignore
>the -2 channel. I'm not sure if you can do this in your ATOC setup (I
>can in the ATC software) or whether it will need an INI tweak.

Other related posts: