[jhb_airlines] Re: FPI Wednesday

  • From: "Mike Brook" <mike.brook@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <jhb_airlines@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 19:11:17 +0100

Unless it all goes t*ts up, I'm going to try and fly at least one sector
tonight.  EGBB-EGMC at 1845Z followed by EGMC to EGNJ sometime later.
I'll be in my trusty JHB F-100 and plan to use real weather (ASv6).
Don't all hold your collective breaths tho'... <G>

MikeB
JHB193

> -----Original Message-----
> From: jhb_airlines-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:jhb_airlines-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Bones
> Sent: Wednesday, August 02, 2006 2:01 AM
> To: jhb_airlines@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [jhb_airlines] Re: FPI Wednesday
>
>
> As weather isn't automatic within FPI the controllers have no
> idea if pilots
> are using real weather or not. We can only assume that some
> are - and set
> our ATIS accordingly. Pilots using real weather can therefore get the
> correct values from us but pilots with no weather set can
> ignore our wind
> and pressure readouts.
>
> I see the awful forecast so it may make for some interesting
> flying. Some
> pilots will be battling strong winds and low cloud to fight
> down the ILS
> whilst mixing it with VFR pilots in perfectly clear skies!
>
> Because FPI isn't operational with weather it can lead to
> tricky moments for
> controllers when vectoring. Those pilots who have strong
> winds dialled in
> will drift significantly and require different headings to
> those using nil
> wind. In the real world once you've worked out the drift for
> your first
> inbound it acts as a template for all subsequent arrivals. We
> can't do this
> in FPI and each aircraft must be treated separately - not a
> good system..
>
> bones
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: jhb_airlines-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:jhb_airlines-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Paul
> Sent: 01 August 2006 22:20
> To: jhb_airlines@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [jhb_airlines] Re: FPI Wednesday
>
>
> Just to add to the mix, weather forecast here for tomorrow evening is
> abysmal.  Heavy Rain so VFR is a no go unless your ditching
> real weather.
>
> Paul
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: jhb_airlines-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:jhb_airlines-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Bones
> Sent: 01 August 2006 12:27
> To: JHB Email List
> Subject: [jhb_airlines] FPI Wednesday
>
>
> Dave has chosen Humberside, Birmingham and Southend for
> tomorrow's session -
> a good choice as they are not that frequently used.
>
> Birmingham to Humberside is only 83nm as the crow flies so is
> ideal for VFR
> traffic. Add to that the fact that EGNJ has no controlled
> airspace other
> than an ATZ and it makes for interesting flying - even IFR
> traffic has to
> keep a good lookout for bandits - the same applies to the new
> Doncaster (ex
> Finningley)airport.
>
>
>
> bones
> bones@xxxxxxx
> http://fsaviation.net
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>



Other related posts: