[jhb_airlines] Re: Descent

  • From: "Paul" <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <jhb_airlines@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2004 14:17:43 -0000

So that's a decent discent without dissent then?

-----Original Message-----
From: jhb_airlines-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:jhb_airlines-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of gwinsk@xxxxxxx
Sent: 14 November 2004 13:01
To: jhb_airlines@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [jhb_airlines] Re: Descent


Or Decent Descent?

Gerry Winskill
gwinsk@xxxxxxx


On 14 Nov 2004 at 11:37, Alastair McIntyre wrote:

> Oops!
>=20
> Should have been 'Descent Profile' <G>
>=20
> Alastair
>=20
> Alastair McIntyre wrote:
>=20
> > Gerry,
> >=20
> > I have found exactly the same with FSNAv. It is very difficult to=20
> > enter a 'stepped' decent profile.
> >=20
> > Perhaps, someone out there may know how to achieve this.!
> >=20
> > Alastair
> >=20
> > gwinsk@xxxxxxx wrote:
> >=20
> >=20
> >>Jumping slightly sideways, trying to enter a height profile into=20
> >>FSNav is not easy. In theory, its facillities for Altitude Crossing=20
> >>and Altitude After, should allow the heights specified in SIDs and=20
> >>STARs to entered. In practice, it seems to  have a life of its own,=20
> >>which reduces its FMS attraction. I used to have a Shareware FMS=20
> >>package but seem to recall its designer dropping out, before FS2002. =

> >>Is there an alternative around? Better still, is there an external=20
> >>hardware lump that will interface with FS9? Pipedream?
> >>
> >>Gerry Winskill
> >>gwinsk@xxxxxxx
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>On 14 Nov 2004 at 3:58, Bones wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>Careful using the word London as I don't know whether you mean=20
> >>>London as in Heathrow Approach or London Centre..
> >>>
> >>>>From Glasgow to Heathrow you would change from Scottish Centre to
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>London
> >>>
> >>>Centre around 55N. You won't go to Manchester as they only have=20
> >>>control up to FL150 in real life but FPI might differ on this.
> >>>
> >>>If only Heathrow Approach is active this can be trickier but plan=20
> >>>ahead to sort out your descent to be at BNN VOR at FL70. Approach=20
> >>>may very well take you on early enough to give you a descent but if =

> >>>he gets too busy with his stack traffic its going to be up to you=20
> >>>to get down in time.
> >>>
> >>>bones
> >>>
> >>>-----Original Message-----
> >>>From: jhb_airlines-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx=20
> >>>[mailto:jhb_airlines-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Alastair=20
> >>>McIntyre Sent: 13 November 2004 21:23 To:=20
> >>>jhb_airlines@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [jhb_airlines] Descent
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>A 'quick' one for John.
> >>>
> >>>John, assuming I am on a IFR flight from EGPF to EGLL.
> >>>
> >>>Only one controller on line at, say, London centre.
> >>>
> >>>Q. on reaching abeam Trent VOR, do I start my descent from F350=20
> >>>WITHOUT contacting the London controller? (As I am out with his=20
> >>>controlled airspace at that point).
> >>>
> >>>I am thinking that it is not too good to leave the descent too=20
> >>>late.
> >>>
> >>>Unlike the real world, at this point I would be under the control=20
> >>>of Manchester, who in turn would hand over to London control.
> >>>
> >>>Thanks, again.
> >>>
> >>>Alastair
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >=20
> >=20
> >=20
>=20




_________________________________________________________________________=
___
This email and all attachments have been electronically scanned by =
Kingston
Communications' email Anti-Virus service and no known viruses were =
detected.
_________________________________________________________________________=
___




____________________________________________________________________________
This email and all attachments have been electronically scanned by Kingston
Communications' email Anti-Virus service and no known viruses were detected.
____________________________________________________________________________



Other related posts: