[jhb_airlines] Re: B350

  • From: "F FISHER" <ffisher991@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <jhb_airlines@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 21:14:27 +0100

Gerry

Currently on flight EGHI-EGEC in FS9 and B350.

Acheiving Bones settings re RPM etc, am down to 1400 prop rpm, levers on zero ident.

Power lever on 60%, torque 70, TAS (from FSC display) 260, push levers to max, torque up to 85% TAS 275, master warning flickers.

Will rerun later in FSX

Frank F
----- Original Message ----- From: "Gerry Winskill" <gwinsk@xxxxxxx>
To: <jhb_airlines@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2008 9:07 PM
Subject: [jhb_airlines] Re: B350




There may be a problem with Control assignments. With something, anyway, since the Prop lever certainly changes the Prop RPM gauge reading, on my setup. Hence my noting that allowing the A350 Prop RPM to fall below 1700 lights up the Master Warning Gauge. I'll send a copy of the Control.xml file that I use for my Saitek setup. Back up your own copy first, then try mine. It lives in the CONTROLS folder, which lives in the same folder as FSX.cfg.

Gerry Winskill

Thats assuming I can set those settings.

Only the throttle lever is having an effect, I can set torque. But prop RPM I cannot. As flfor ight idle, it is not working.

Perhaps it is better explained on a one to one, better with a co-pilot on board, who can give a command and explain how to achieve it.

Fuel flow and RPM seem to be linked to the throttle. I cannot seem to set them separatly.

Unless I am doing something radically wrong, after all, I have only just found out how to start it manually, seems I have been pressing the wrong key

all these years.(E plus 1 then E plus 2 to select the engines, not Ctrl plus

E then 1 or 2) a different combination to all other aircraft it seems.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Bones" <bones@xxxxxxx>
To: <jhb_airlines@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2008 2:22 PM
Subject: [jhb_airlines] Re: B350


What would be interesting is for several pilots to fly an identical route using identical values and then compare times and fuel burn afterwards. For this to work everyone would have to start off with the same fuel load and pax load so that AUW is identical and fly an identical route. Differences
would then show up purely through handling and engine management.

To get up to FL250 for a reasonable time a sector length of about 300nm
would be about right -just over an hour's flight. An example would be
Southampton to Campbeltown via BCN WAL IOM and BLACA. As I don't have FS
running I can't suggest nominal power settings but Condition levers should
be at Flight Idle and Props at 1700rpm. Ideally power should be set to
produce a TAS of 250kts which would probably be about 170kts IAS.

bones
bones@xxxxxxx
http://woodair.net

-----Original Message-----
From: jhb_airlines-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:jhb_airlines-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Fred Stopforth
Sent: 19 August 2008 08:27
To: jhb_airlines@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [jhb_airlines] Re: B350

Ah will try that altitude on the way back and see what I report.This
exercise is giving me a little interest. Thanks. Fred
----- Original Message ----- From: "Bones" <bones@xxxxxxx>
To: <jhb_airlines@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2008 3:09 AM
Subject: [jhb_airlines] Re: B350


Normal cruising altitude for a King Air is FL250 or thereabouts and the
fuel
burn drops off significantly at that height.

bones
bones@xxxxxxx
http://woodair.net


-----Original Message-----
From: jhb_airlines-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:jhb_airlines-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Fred Stopforth
Sent: 19 August 2008 01:22
To: jhb_airlines@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [jhb_airlines] Re: B350

Hi Frank thought I would have a go at your EKVG --> BIRK IFR and see what the comparison might be. Here's my report -- covered 525nm /used 230 gals
/

GS 217knts / Start to shutdown 2hrs 25 mins. Cond 45% /Props 60% /Throt 85/99% //Prop revs were 1600.Just wondered how we compared in our flight
effort.BTW I went to 12500'.  Fred
----- Original Message ----- From: "F FISHER" <ffisher991@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <jhb_airlines@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, August 18, 2008 8:27 PM
Subject: [jhb_airlines] Re: B350


Like Gerry says, it is going to be a case of a lot of trials and
paperwork.

Just taken off from Vagar on route Rek online.

All levers full on in climb, used 110G!! (start 417)speed 210 IAS

Power back to 85 % torque(75%) speed 210 still FF 5.TAS(per FSC)261.

Have altered FSC database to show cruise speed 215 range 1000, the FP
distance is 417 time 2hours.

We will see what time I arrive.

But still gobbling up fuel!!

Frank F

Ps off to bathroom, back in 15 minutes



----- Original Message ----- From: "Bones" <bones@xxxxxxx>
To: <jhb_airlines@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, August 18, 2008 7:48 PM
Subject: [jhb_airlines] Re: B350


It's NOT a mixture lever Frank. Mixture levers only exist on pistons.
It's a
Condition lever and it's not got anything to do with fuel flow. It only
has
High Idle (used for reverse thrust) Low Idle (used for everything else)
and
Cut Off positions. You can waggle it about all you want in flight but it
won't do anything.

Fuel flow on a turboprop is automatically metered and controlled by
Power
and Prop levers settings. If you are burning too much fuel it's because
you
are using the wrong Power or Prop values.

As I've said before a turboprop is a JET engine and it works exactly the
same way. Jets don't have mixture either.



bones
bones@xxxxxxx
http://woodair.net


-----Original Message-----
From: jhb_airlines-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:jhb_airlines-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of F FISHER
Sent: 18 August 2008 19:22
To: jhb_airlines@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [jhb_airlines] Re: B350

This is why I am altering the FSC database to suit.

The B350 has 3 sets of levers all Black

My physical layout is the Saitek Yoke with twin throttles, 3 levers on
each(Black Blue and Red)

The mixture lever(Red) alters the fuel flow not by much but is around 5,
I
alter the power and condition levers to keep under the red line at about
75%. Closing the Mixture lever completely, cuts the engines.

I bring the mix control down during the climb to 25% at FL100

Max climb is about 160, and cruise 210, totally different to the FSC
database. With a tail wind, this will go up to about 230, at FL150.

FSC bases it flight time and distance according to it's database which
to
my

mind is not accurate.Someone needs to do some research.

I have yet to find an FS aircraft that performs to stated spec.As far as
FSC

is concerned anyway.

Even in formation, I have to max the power to match other online flyers.
But

that is another issue.

The other issue I have to sort out is the v.high taxi speed, but I think this is something to do with the condition lever, normally keeping the
speed

down with the brakes and also steering with the brakes.

I like the aircraft, but do need to learn how to use it to best
advantage.

Frank F





----- Original Message ----- From: "Bones" <bones@xxxxxxx>
To: <jhb_airlines@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, August 18, 2008 5:01 PM
Subject: [jhb_airlines] Re: B350


FSC has the distance a bit wrong - it's just 801nm direct. It's got the
range totally wrong too - a King Air can't stay up for 16 hours
(4100/250).
Just over 1000nm with no reserves would be a better figure.

The King Air doesn't have a mixture control (no turboprops do). They
have
Power, Prop and Condition levers so I can't guess what levers you are
referring to. Fuel flow rate is determined by the power and prop
settings
so
you may need to check these to stop drinking too much of the
stuff -props
need only be around 1700-1900. The condition levers only have High
Idle,
Low
Idle and Cutoff positions and you never touch these after engines are
started.

bones
bones@xxxxxxx
http://woodair.net


-----Original Message-----
From: jhb_airlines-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:jhb_airlines-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of F FISHER
Sent: 18 August 2008 16:35
To: jhb_airlines@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [jhb_airlines] B350

Beech King Air 350.

Currently doing a run from EGNS-BIRK

FSC states distance 881nm 2:52mins at cruise speed 512kts.

Am set with Mixture at 25%, condition at 75% power 75%.

KIAS on FSX 260kts.

220 nm short of ING, now right turn 90 for Vagar to refuel as down to
100G
from 425G

I am in the proces of realtering the aircraft database in FSC to
reflect
to
the true air speed I am attaining, this should give me a truer flight
time.

FSC aircraft database gives a range of 4100nm, no way, with full tanks
should I have to divert, am I doing something wrong??

Or should Ibe flying something with a higher range.

Frank F




No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
Version: 8.0.138 / Virus Database: 270.6.5/1618 - Release Date:
18/08/2008
06:51






No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
Version: 8.0.138 / Virus Database: 270.6.5/1618 - Release Date:
18/08/2008 06:51





No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com Version: 8.0.138 / Virus Database:
270.6.5/1618 - Release Date: 8/18/2008 6:51 AM





No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
Version: 8.0.138 / Virus Database: 270.6.5/1619 - Release Date: 8/18/2008
5:39 PM





No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
Version: 8.0.138 / Virus Database: 270.6.5/1620 - Release Date: 19/08/2008

06:04









No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com Version: 8.0.138 / Virus Database: 270.6.5/1620 - Release Date: 19/08/2008 06:04





Other related posts: