RE: which authorization to use?
- From: "Aman Singer" <aman@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 19:51:33 -0500
Hi.
It doesn't effect NT/2K/XP users in any way in which other users are
not effected. That is, the authorization will work in the same way with
these systems as it does now (you have to have a Pro key, etc).
No, you don't need an internet authorization to install the new
authorization. See
http://www.freedomscientific.com/_vti_Activate/FSActivate.asp
Aman
-----Original Message-----
From: jfw-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:jfw-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Sean McMahon
Sent: December 15, 2004 7:14 PM
To: jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: which authorization to use?
Does anyone know how this affects us nt/winxp-pro users? Does this mean you
need
a internet connection to install the new authorization? Sean
----- Original Message -----
From: "Chris & Mary" <cmchaffin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2004 4:33 PM
Subject: Re: which authorization to use?
> Hi there,
> The ILM disk comes with the shipment of Jaws 6.0. There is no cost for
the
> ILM disk. But Jaws 6.0 does count against your SMA.
> The reason FS is doing away with the quella authorization, and going to
the
> Internet authorization, is because alot of new computers are not coming
with
> 3.5 floppy disk drives anymore. FS knows that 3.5 floppy disk are
gradually
> becoming extinct, so they are changing their authorization format.
> The reason FS is continuing the quella authorization until March is
because
> that is when everybody should have their CD copy of Jaws 6.0 and the ILM
> disk.
> Hope this helps,
> Chris Chaffin
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "chevelle" <chevelle33@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2004 6:07 PM
> Subject: Re: which authorization to use?
>
>
> > Ok so since I have one upgrade remaining is fs forcing us to pay
something
> > for this ILM disc? If so that's not right! Why is fs making the quella
> > version run out in March.
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Jarrod Jicha" <jamminjerry@xxxxxxxxx>
> > To: <jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2004 5:45 PM
> > Subject: Re: which authorization to use?
> >
> >
> >> if you have an authorization installed from a floppy disk, then you
need
> >> the
> >> quel one, not the internet one. the internet one is for people that
> >> already
> >> have the internet one set up on there computer, or if they are using a
> >> dongle. like myself.
> >>
> >> ----- Original Message -----
> >> From: "chevelle" <chevelle33@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> To: <jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2004 5:07 PM
> >> Subject: which authorization to use?
> >>
> >>
> >> Ok, I'm a little uncertain. In the downloads area of
> >> www.freedomscientific.com there are two choces. Jaws 6.0 with the
quella
> >> or
> >> jaws 6.0 with hte ILM. I hae the jaws 5.10 which I downloaded from the
> >> web.
> >> Can I use the ILM? or do I have to use the quella. I'm hoping I can use
> >> the
> >> ILM because the quella runs out in March. I do have one upgrade left so
> >> will
> >> that entitle me to use the ILM? Thanks.
> >> --
> >> To post a message to the list, send it to jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send a message to
> >> jfw-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject
line.
> >> Archives located at: //www.freelists.org/archives/jfw
> >>
> >> If you have any concerns about the list, post received from the list,
or
> >> the
> >> way the list is being run, do not post them to the list. Rather contact
> >> the
> >> list owner at jfw-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> To post a message to the list, send it to jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send a message to
> >> jfw-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject
line.
> >> Archives located at: //www.freelists.org/archives/jfw
> >>
> >> If you have any concerns about the list, post received from the list,
or
> >> the way the list is being run, do not post them to the list. Rather
> >> contact the list owner at jfw-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> > --
> > To post a message to the list, send it to jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send a message to
> > jfw-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.
> > Archives located at: //www.freelists.org/archives/jfw
> >
> > If you have any concerns about the list, post received from the list, or
> > the way the list is being run, do not post them to the list. Rather
> > contact the list owner at jfw-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
>
> --
> To post a message to the list, send it to jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send a message to
jfw-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.
> Archives located at: //www.freelists.org/archives/jfw
>
> If you have any concerns about the list, post received from the list, or
the
way the list is being run, do not post them to the list. Rather contact the
list
owner at jfw-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
--
To post a message to the list, send it to jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send a message to
jfw-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.
Archives located at: //www.freelists.org/archives/jfw
If you have any concerns about the list, post received from the list, or the
way the list is being run, do not post them to the list. Rather contact the
list owner at jfw-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
To post a message to the list, send it to jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send a message to
jfw-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.
Archives located at: //www.freelists.org/archives/jfw
If you have any concerns about the list, post received from the list, or the
way the list is being run, do not post them to the list. Rather contact the
list owner at jfw-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Other related posts:
