RE: using google translator was RE: coding?
- From: "Harmony Neil" <harmonylm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2011 19:57:01 +0100
To be fair, google translate alone is grammatically inaccurate.
From: jfw-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:jfw-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of CrisMunoz54
Sent: 27 March 2011 19:12
To: jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: using google translator was RE: coding?
Firefox has an accessible google translator add-on. It's called Fast
translate.
Also, the site I go to for longer translations is:
http://www.spanish-translator-services.com/espanol/traductor-gratis.htm
This page is in Spanish, but if you're familiar with the language, then it
should be easy enough to get around.
I find its results are much more accurate than Google translator. I do
translations on the side (contracts, county bulletins etc) and this site is
quite helpful.
_____
From: jfw-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:jfw-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of kimsan
Sent: Sunday, March 27, 2011 11:05 AM
To: jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: using google translator was RE: coding?
lol, please keep in mind not everyone uses Kurzwhile.
Email me off list if you'd like. I cannot seem to get google translator
down.
Just in case you don't want to email me off list here's the issue.
I'm always interested in translating english into spanish but the problem I
have is picking the language to translate into the other language. I seem to
get it some times and others, no.
So, how do I pick english and then pick spanish as the language to translate
the word/phrase into?
Thanks.
From: jfw-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:jfw-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Yadiel Sotomayor
Sent: Sunday, March 27, 2011 10:47 AM
To: jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: coding?
Google translator? As a translator-in-traning I am offended. Why use that
garbage? Kurzwhile does a better job anyway.<smile> Kenny, I am just pulling
your chain. Still, I believe google translator is accessible. I've used it
quite a bit (don't tell my professors). Smile emoticon
From: kimsan <mailto:kimsansong@xxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, March 27, 2011 1:32 PM
To: jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: coding?
Wow that sounds neat and cootos to you John for doing such a thing.
How about google translator?
From: jfw-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:jfw-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of John Martyn
Sent: Saturday, March 26, 2011 11:12 AM
To: jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: coding?
That would be me doing the coding. We're basically deciding on what to work
with. It comes down to what freedom scientific will do in their plans, what
google is doing with google docs, how much time it takes to code, the
difficulty of the application, and the need of everyone as a whole. The
earlier posts state very well what we are considering for the next
accessible application. I can't very well code everything, so it's weighing
the options. This is the only place where I can get the most suggestions out
of people who really have the need. So far, some really good suggestion have
been made. MS access, google docs, and iTunes just to name a few.
Access has got me nervous actually. That application is loaded. I actually
hope FS has it in mind to do something about it. Apparently they must feel
the same about it otherwise they would have coded it themselves.
----- Original Message -----
From: kimsan <mailto:kimsansong@xxxxxxx>
To: jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Sunday, March 27, 2011 8:24 AM
Subject: coding?
I haven't followed this thread but who is going to do all of this coding?
Yadiel J. Sotomayor
E-MAIL: yadosotomayor@xxxxxxxxxxx
Other related posts:
