RE: the accessibility of office 2003 with jaws 5.00.844?

  • From: Anna K Byrne <annakb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Fri, 28 May 2004 07:12:06 -0500

Yes, Windows XP Pro requires a different version of JFW.  And the only 
significant difference between the two is that the pro version gives better 
networking support, so it's geared more to corporate situations.


At 06:33 AM 5/28/2004, you wrote:
>It works fairly well, but from what I understand Freedom Scientific has not
>yet ensured that Office 2003 is accessible.  I have not had any major
>problems with it, but here's one example of something that didn't work well.
>I know how to create mailing labels in Word using an Excel database, but I
>was unable to do it with Office 2003, because they've created a new and
>improved module for mailing labels; unfortunately it doesn't seem to be very
>speech friendly.
>That was the only significant problem I found.  By the way, I'm using
>Windows XP Home edition, not Professional.  Not sure if that makes a
>difference. I was going to upgrade to Professional, but I think it requires
>a more expensive version of JAWS.  Somebody correct me if I'm wrong on that.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: jfw-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:jfw-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
>Of Shai Wolman
>Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2004 11:25 PM
>To: jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: the accessibility of office 2003 with jaws 5.00.844?
>
>Hi I would like to know how well does the new version of office (office
>2003) work with jaws 5.00.844 on a windows xp professional machine in
>regards to accessibility?
>I would imagine that it would work just the same, but I'm just curious,
>since the college will also be converting to that as well in the summer
>before I get there and if there are any concerns about it, I would like to
>perhaps let the people there know so that they don't upgrade to it and then
>later on we find that it is inaccessible (by the way accessibility wise) I
>mean word in regards to the spell checker and things of that sort) I also
>believe that I also mean access and excel also.
>Any help with this would be appreciated.
>Thank you
>
>--
>To post a message to the list, send it to jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe
>from this mailing list, send a message to jfw-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the
>word unsubscribe in the subject line.
>Archives located at: //www.freelists.org/archives/jfw
>
>If you have any concerns about the list, post received from the list, or the
>way the list is being run, do not post them to the list. Rather contact the
>list owner at jfw-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>--
>To post a message to the list, send it to jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send a message to 
>jfw-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.
>Archives located at: //www.freelists.org/archives/jfw
>
>If you have any concerns about the list, post received from the list, or 
>the way the list is being run, do not post them to the list. Rather 
>contact the list owner at jfw-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx



--
To post a message to the list, send it to jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send a message to 
jfw-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.
Archives located at: //www.freelists.org/archives/jfw

If you have any concerns about the list, post received from the list, or the 
way the list is being run, do not post them to the list. Rather contact the 
list owner at jfw-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Other related posts: