RE: start menu vs classic menu.
- From: "jim grimsby" <jimgrims@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 15:22:01 -0800
That's right Jack, you got it. Plus, the windows xp start menu is in 2=20
pains across the screen, whereas the classic start menu from windows=20
95/98/me is only on the left side of the screen so JAWS can focus on it=20
better.
That's why FS recomends the use of the classic windows 95/98/me start =
menu.=20
Jaws has no problems handeling these pains. I also think that fs tells
people to turn it to clasic start menu for the same reason they tell =
people
to turn to clasic folders it is because it is what the majority of blind
people are use to. Note there is no reason to move to clasic folder =
ither
as far as jaws is conserned. I did change to clasic folders symply =
because
I did not like all thoughs buttons being there when I can access the =
menu
bar or press a key to do the same thing. I also know though that some =
new
users of windows find being able to tab to the option they want using =
the
new folder system to be helpful. In eather case jaws has no problems
tracking what is going on.=20
--
To post a message to the list, send it to jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send a message to
jfw-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.
Archives located at: //www.freelists.org/archives/jfw
If you have any concerns about the list, post received from the list, or the
way the list is being run, do not post them to the list. Rather contact the
list owner at jfw-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Other related posts:
