Re: removing authorization key, putting it back later

  • From: John Heim <jheim@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 20:22:21 -0600

I don't think I should have to payan additional $45 just to maintain an authorization when I already paid $1000 for the license itself. JFW wants *me* to pay because their authorization scheme is broken. As a matter of principle, that strikes me as unfair.


And before you say, "Well, that's the rules" -- Yes, I know that those are the rules. I'm saying the rules are stupid and unfair. I don't like the rules. That is just my opinion. But I think my opinion is well grounded in facts. No other software company I know of demands anything even close to this. I think FS is going to drive customers away with this scheme. They're sure driving me away.

Not only is it a matter of principle, but there is a ton of paper work in buying something around here. And worse than that, I have to go to my boss and my boss's boss and explain that once again I need them to buy me something because I'm disabled. I know it's not a huge deal. They are legally obligated to do it, after all. But it's embarrassing.

I'm tellin' ya, it just ain't right.









----- Original Message ----- From: "Joseph Lee" <joseph.lee22590@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2007 4:07 PM
Subject: Re: removing authorization key, putting it back later


John,
Then the best option is to get a dongle.

----- Original Message -----
From: "John Heim" <jheim@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
To: <jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date sent: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 16:01:07 -0600
Subject: Re: removing authorization key,
putting it back later

Look, I've already said several times that I
understand how it works.
Please stop explaining to me *why* it works
the way it does.  That isn't
going to change my opinion.  First of all, I
understand how it works.
Second, I don't care.

I don't care about the technical explanation.
Why would I?The bottom line is
that I can't swap out my CD-ROM drive if it
fails without phoning FS.

In my opinion, the authorization scheme shows
a huge amount of arrogance on
the part of FS.  Either that or foolishness.
I don't think they can afford to
anger their customers right about now.  Not
with VoiceOver and orca
breathing down their necks (not to mention
Windo-eyes).

Maybe this is OT for this list.  Is the
future of JFW a valid topic? If so, I
am saying that I am not happy.  I have
actively begun looking for
alternatives.  VoiceOver looks very
promising.  I'd probably have switched by
now except it has one killer defect, it
doesn't read the terminal window
text unless you use the cursor keys.  It's
like you have to use the jaws
cursor and arrow around in the window.
Several of us VO users have entered
bug reports with Apple about this.  I'm
hoping it's fixed in the next release
of the MacOS.  If so, I'm outta here and FS
has blown a $1000 re-licensing
fee.

Of course, they'd probably lose me as a
customer anyway as soon as either
VoiceOver or orca get to be good enough to be
used every day for real work.
Maybe they realize that and figure JFW has a
limited life anyway.  That would
explain why they're so draconian about
licensing.  Maybe they're trying to
get as much out of it as they can before it's
obsolete.


----- Original Message -----
From: "Joseph Lee"
<joseph.lee22590@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To: <jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2007 3:16 PM
Subject: Re: removing authorization key,
putting it back later


John,
Part of the auth code is the computer's
hardware fingerprint.  This is
crucial when activating JAWS.  If you
chaarge a hardware (for example,
CD-ROM or adding additional memory (which
I've done), the next time JAWS
starts, it will find that the hardware is
different from what it is used
to.  When you look at the locking code
(hardware fingerprint), you'll
notice that it has changed.  At that
pointeay'll need to reactivate JAWS.
Locate your Auth CD and activate your
software.  If you remember your auth
code (20 alph-numeric string), type it in
the auth box.
Cheers,
Joseph

----- Original Message -----
From: "John Heim" <jheim@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
To: <jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date sent: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 10:49:23 -0600
Subject: Re: removing authorization key,
putting it back later

I don't know which way is better.  A couple
of weeks ago, my CD-ROM drive
died.  I swapped in a new one and lost my
jaws authorization.  Now, that is
bogus.  Why in the world would I have to
reauthorize a license for anything
just because I swapped out a CD-ROM drive?
Oh, I know there is a good
*technical* explanation.  But from a customer
service standpoint, that is
truly bogus.

When you pay $1000 for a piece of software,
you expect better service than
that.

From: "Lisle, Ted (CHFS DMS)"
<Ted.Lisle@xxxxxx
To: <jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2007 6:58 AM
Subject: RE: removing authorization key,
putting it back later


This is really not as big a hassle as it
seems.  In a lot of ways, ILM's
are less trouble than their predecessors.
You no longer have to worry
about an optimization program trashing your
key.  Furthermore, if you do
need a fresh supply, getting replacements is
far easier than it used to
be.  The old process involved either reset
codes, which did not always
work, or waiting for a fresh disc to arrive.

Ted

-----Original Message-----
From: jfw-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:jfw-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Leonard Salinas
Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2007 12:30 AM
To: jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: re: removing authorization key,
putting it back later


not only that, if you change any hardware in
your system the ilm
authorization is render invalid.


Legend has it that on Monday 1/29/2007 11:23
PM, Joseph Lee said:
Patricia,
ILM is different from Quela authorization.
If you have Quela autherization (JAWS 5.1 or
earlier), use HJAUTH
utility to save the auth key back to the
diskette and install it
later.  With ILM, you can indeed remove auth
code, but you cannot
install it later.
You'll need to activate it again (ILM looks
for the hardware
fingerprint in order for it to work).  If the
drive is changed (for
example, formatted), then it will ask you to
reactivate it.
Cheers,
Joseph

----- Original Message -----
From: "Patricia" <bcsarah.fan@xxxxxxxxx
To: <jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date sent: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 21:21:52 -0800
Subject: removing authorization key, putting
it back later

is there a way that you can remove your
authorization key (sauy for formatting your
computer) and then
putting it back later so that you don't have
to redo your keys
thereby losing another key? I don't see any
way of doing this, and
am asking on a friend's behalf but I think
that if there ins't a way
there should be because then people wouldn't
have to constantly call
FS or fill out the form online.

Patricia

e-mail: bcsarah.fan@xxxxxxxxx
msn: bc_sarah_fan@xxxxxxxxxxx
--
JFW related links:
JFW homepage:
http://www.freedomscientific.com/
Scripting mailing list:
http://lists.the-jdh.com/listinfo.cgi/scripto
graphy-the-jdh.com
JFW List instructions:
To post a message to the list, send it to
jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send a
message to
jfw-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word
unsubscribe in the subject
line.
Archives located at:
//www.freelists.org/archives/jfw

If you have any concerns about the list, post
received from the
list, or the way the list is being run, do
not post them to the
list.  Rather contact the list owner at
jfw-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

--
JFW related links:
JFW homepage:
http://www.freedomscientific.com/
Scripting mailing list:


http://lists.the-jdh.com/listinfo.cgi/scripto
graphy-the-jdh.com
JFW List instructions:
To post a message to the list, send it to
jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send
a message to
jfw-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word
unsubscribe in the subject line.
Archives located at:
//www.freelists.org/archives/jfw

If you have any concerns about the list,
post received from the list, or
the way the list is being run, do not post
them to the list.  Rather
contact the list owner at
jfw-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
JFW related links:
JFW homepage:
http://www.freedomscientific.com/
Scripting mailing list:


http://lists.the-jdh.com/listinfo.cgi/scripto
graphy-the-jdh.com
JFW List instructions:
To post a message to the list, send it to
jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send
a message to
jfw-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word
unsubscribe in the subject line.
Archives located at:
//www.freelists.org/archives/jfw

If you have any concerns about the list,
post received from the list, or
the way the list is being run, do not post
them to the list.  Rather
contact the list owner at
jfw-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx



--
JFW related links:
JFW homepage:
http://www.freedomscientific.com/
Scripting mailing list:

http://lists.the-jdh.com/listinfo.cgi/scripto
graphy-the-jdh.com
JFW List instructions:
To post a message to the list, send it to
jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send a
message to jfw-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
the word unsubscribe in the
subject line.
Archives located at:
//www.freelists.org/archives/jfw

If you have any concerns about the list, post
received from the list, or the way the list
is being run, do not post them
to the list.  Rather contact the list owner
at jfw-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
JFW related links:
JFW homepage:
http://www.freedomscientific.com/
Scripting mailing list:

http://lists.the-jdh.com/listinfo.cgi/scripto
graphy-the-jdh.com
JFW List instructions:
To post a message to the list, send it to
jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send
a message to
jfw-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word
unsubscribe in the subject line.
Archives located at:
//www.freelists.org/archives/jfw

If you have any concerns about the list,
post received from the list, or
the way the list is being run, do not post
them to the list.  Rather
contact the list owner at
jfw-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx



--
JFW related links:
JFW homepage:
http://www.freedomscientific.com/
Scripting mailing list:
http://lists.the-jdh.com/listinfo.cgi/scripto
graphy-the-jdh.com
JFW List instructions:
To post a message to the list, send it to
jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send a
message to jfw-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.
Archives located at:
//www.freelists.org/archives/jfw

If you have any concerns about the list, post
received from the list, or the way the list is being run, do not post them to the list. Rather contact the list owner at jfw-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
JFW related links:
JFW homepage: http://www.freedomscientific.com/
Scripting mailing list: http://lists.the-jdh.com/listinfo.cgi/scriptography-the-jdh.com
JFW List instructions:
To post a message to the list, send it to jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send a message to jfw-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.
Archives located at: //www.freelists.org/archives/jfw

If you have any concerns about the list, post received from the list, or the way the list is being run, do not post them to the list. Rather contact the list owner at jfw-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx



--
JFW related links:
JFW homepage: http://www.freedomscientific.com/
Scripting mailing list: 
http://lists.the-jdh.com/listinfo.cgi/scriptography-the-jdh.com
JFW List instructions:
To post a message to the list, send it to jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send a message to 
jfw-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.
Archives located at: //www.freelists.org/archives/jfw

If you have any concerns about the list, post received from the list, or the 
way the list is being run, do not post them to the list. Rather contact the 
list owner at jfw-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Other related posts: