Re: removing authorization key, putting it back later

  • From: "John Heim" <jheim@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 16:40:51 -0600

Geez, if I didn't know better, I'd think you were making a deliberate effort to misconstrue what i say.


Clearly, I differentiated between discussing it on this list and telling FS about it. I said I'm discussing it on this list because it came up. Apparently, it's a topic worthy of discussion judging by the number of posts. And I didn't say I'm discussing it on this list to tell FS about it.

Do I have to explicitly explain everything I say? Okay... I told FS about the problem via email to their support email address. Clear enough?

From: "Bruce Toews" <dogriver@xxxxxxxx>
To: <jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2007 3:34 PM
Subject: Re: removing authorization key, putting it back later


If you think you told FS that you felt the scheme unacceptable by
posting to this list, think again. FS isn't on this list.
On Tue, 30 Jan 2007 15:28:08 -0600, "John Heim" <jheim@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
said:

----- Original Message ----- From: "Bruce Toews" <dogriver@xxxxxxxx>
To: <jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2007 2:49 PM
Subject: Re: removing authorization key, putting it back later


> For one thing, it's not a problem. It's by design.

It's  a problem  for me! I don't care if it's by design.

My CD-ROM dies and instead of just being able to swap it out, I have to
call
FS and get reauthorized? That's bogus. Why would I care if it's a bug or
by
design

>For a second thing,
> if you're going to be using it, you'd darned well better read up on it.

Who says?

An authorization scheme that requires you to study it is itself a defect.
I'm a professional programmer. And I consider it a failure on my part
every
time I have to explain how to use one of my programs. Sometimes it's
impossible to have things simple enough that they need no explanation.
But I
haven't had to study the authorization scheme for any other software I've
ever licensed. I don't lose my Windows XP authorization when i swap out a
CD-ROM drive.

> Third, whether you or anyone else thinks it's stupid is irrelevant, > this
> is the way it is. Ranting and stamping your foot isn't going to change

First of all, I'm not "ranting" nor am I "stamping my foot". I'm stating
my
opinion just as you are stating yours.
If you're questioning why I'm talking about it on this list, well, it
came
up. Why are you talking about it?

But more importantly, this is how things get changed. They certainly
won't
change if nobody complains. I told FS that I found their authorization
scheme unacceptable. I did them a favor in doing so.


--
JFW related links:
JFW homepage: http://www.freedomscientific.com/
Scripting mailing list:
http://lists.the-jdh.com/listinfo.cgi/scriptography-the-jdh.com
JFW List instructions:
To post a message to the list, send it to jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send a message to
jfw-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.
Archives located at: //www.freelists.org/archives/jfw

If you have any concerns about the list, post received from the list, or
the way the list is being run, do not post them to the list. Rather
contact the list owner at jfw-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

--
Bruce Toews
E-mail and MSN/Windows Messenger: dogriver@xxxxxxxx
Website: http://www.ogts.net
Radio Show and Podcast: http://www.totw.net
Info on the Best TV Show of All Time: http://www.cornergas.com

--
JFW related links:
JFW homepage: http://www.freedomscientific.com/
Scripting mailing list: http://lists.the-jdh.com/listinfo.cgi/scriptography-the-jdh.com
JFW List instructions:
To post a message to the list, send it to jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send a message to jfw-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.
Archives located at: //www.freelists.org/archives/jfw

If you have any concerns about the list, post received from the list, or the way the list is being run, do not post them to the list. Rather contact the list owner at jfw-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx



--
JFW related links:
JFW homepage: http://www.freedomscientific.com/
Scripting mailing list: 
http://lists.the-jdh.com/listinfo.cgi/scriptography-the-jdh.com
JFW List instructions:
To post a message to the list, send it to jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send a message to 
jfw-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.
Archives located at: //www.freelists.org/archives/jfw

If you have any concerns about the list, post received from the list, or the 
way the list is being run, do not post them to the list. Rather contact the 
list owner at jfw-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Other related posts: