Re: open book

  • From: "Dave Carlson" <dgcarlson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 14:29:05 -0700

Bob,

If you're looking at U.S. money, they are slowly changing (or have already done 
so by now) the overall look. The U.S. engravers have made the portraits larger 
in size, added some minute laser inscriptions, and are now introducing a wide 
color band through some portion of the paper to further foil counterfeiters, 
and many money-changing machines and casino slot machines have had to be 
updated as these new bills begin to circulate.

So that would imply that Openbook might be impacted by this migration into 
colors, and if you have an older version of Openbook (7 or earlier) you might 
indeed have some issues with Buckscan. 

Buckscan consists of a set of images stored in memory, of key portions of 
various paper-money denominations that are used to do a comparison with the 
image you scan in. The better the correlation, the more likely it is that 
Buckscan will recognize the money.

If the bill is worn, wrinkled, folded, or otherwise marked in those key areas, 
recognition will be negatively impacted. Same holds for any changes made by the 
engravers to foil counterfeiting.

The key areas are the corners of the U.S. bills, as this is where the 
denomination ($1, $5, $10, etc.) is engraved, front and back. So the images 
stored in Buckscan are not images of the entire front and rear, just the 
corners.

So long story short, if you don't have the latest Openbook, that could be one 
problem. If you do, it could also be due to the quality or revision of the bill 
you're scanning.

You might want to check with Freedom Scientific to see if they have any updates 
to Buckscan.

Dave

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: onwardbob 
  To: jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2009 11:37
  Subject: open book


  I know OPEN BOOK isn't perfect, but does anyone have any suggestions 
regarding the buck scan feature. Most of the time it won't even read the bill 
in question, and its incorrect so often, I don't trust it. help, Bob

Other related posts: