Re: newer auth key, older Jaws

  • From: "Flor Lynch" <florlync@xxxxxx>
  • To: <jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sun, 6 Feb 2005 02:42:38 -0000

JAWS3.0 will not work well with any operating system above Windows95 or
the then current version of Windows NT (1997).  The first version of JFW
to work with Windows 98 was 3.02, and that was unofficial.  Then we had
JAWS 3.3 and 3.31 and Windows 98 was properly supported since then.
Thus, not much fun is to be had on a forward operating system that
screen reader can't comprehend.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jack Lowe" <akronjack1982@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, February 05, 2005 10:11 PM
Subject: newer auth key, older Jaws


OK, I know this will sound odd.  But a friend of mine wants to play
around with an older version of Jaws, just to see what it's like.  I
believe it's version 3.0.  But, his key came with his version 4.0.  Will
that more recent key still authorize that older version of jaws?
I told him that he's crazy, but he wants to do it just for the fun of
it.  He's running 6.0 with the ILM authorization.  No other versions of
Jaws are on his PC right now.    Jack
--
To post a message to the list, send it to jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send a message to
jfw-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.
Archives located at: //www.freelists.org/archives/jfw

If you have any concerns about the list, post received from the list, or
the way the list is being run, do not post them to the list. Rather
contact the list owner at jfw-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx


--
To post a message to the list, send it to jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send a message to 
jfw-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.
Archives located at: //www.freelists.org/archives/jfw

If you have any concerns about the list, post received from the list, or the 
way the list is being run, do not post them to the list. Rather contact the 
list owner at jfw-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Other related posts: