Chris, That's an excellent idea about moving the Realspeak to another harddrive. My computer is very fast already, but anything to make it faster is always a good thing. I very likely will try that suggestion. Thanks much. Kim -------------------------------------------------- From: "Chris Smart" <chris_s@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Monday, July 06, 2009 10:57 AM To: <jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: RealSpeak Again... Has Anyone Else Found... > At 09:55 AM 7/6/2009, Kim wrote: > >>Has anyone else found that, when navigating sites or text using >>the Realspeak synthesizer, that it's a big more sluggish than, >>say, Eloquence? > > Yes, the larger and higher quality the software synthesizer, > generally, the more computing resources it requires. You'll notice > similar behavior if you try the AT&T naturallySpeaking voices or > Neospeech voices. Having these on a separate partition or hard > drive may help, or using a faster computer. > > Eloquence is snappy now, but I remember when it to, on the slower > computers of a decade ago, wasn't as responsive as a good hardware > synthesizer. I still prefer my TripleTalk for that reason - I know > that my system is being slowed down as little as possible by my > screenreader. > > Chris > > -- > JFW related links: > JFW homepage: http://www.freedomscientific.com/ > Scripting mailing list: > http://lists.the-jdh.com/listinfo.cgi/scriptography-the-jdh.com > JFW List instructions: > To post a message to the list, send it to jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send a message to > jfw-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line. > Archives located at: //www.freelists.org/archives/jfw > Alternative archives located at: > http://n2.nabble.com/JAWS-for-Windows-f2145279.html > > If you have any concerns about the list, post received from the list, or the > way the list is being run, do not post them to the list. Rather contact the > list owner at jfw-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx >