Re: Reading differences between 4.51 and 5.0
- From: "Chandni" <chandni1@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 1 May 2004 18:18:14 +0200
Thank you. Is there a way to correct the apostrophe problem still keeping
punctuation to ALL? Can something be done using the dictionary manager, for
instance?
Thanks so much
Fran
----- Original Message -----
From: "Chris Chaffin" <chaffin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, May 01, 2004 5:53 PM
Subject: Re: Reading differences between 4.51 and 5.0
> Hi,
> The apostrophe problem is an eloquence problem, and FS does know about
this
> problem. I reported it to them back when Jaws 5.00844 was originally
> released. They personally contacted me, and let me know that the problem
> was turned over to their developers, and hopefully it would be corrected
in
> a future release of Jaws.
> Chris Chaffin
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Chandni" <chandni1@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Saturday, May 01, 2004 11:16 AM
> Subject: Re: Reading differences between 4.51 and 5.0
>
>
> > Hi guys,
> > I also found a diference in the way JFW 5 reads numbers. But my real
> problem
> > is the apostrophe. I like to keep punctuation set to ALL, and this way
> JAWS
> > 5 will always read the ' sign as "apostrophe", so that for instance, the
> > word it's is read "it apostrophe s, instead of "its"". Does it happen to
> any
> > of you? Actually this also happens with 4.5, but it didn't happen with
> 4.2.
> >
> > Fran
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "curmudgeon les" <one2three4five6@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > To: <jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Saturday, May 01, 2004 3:43 PM
> > Subject: Re: Reading differences between 4.51 and 5.0
> >
> >
> > > in text processing,
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > I check, speak dollar
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > in punctuation mode, controlled by jaws
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > in numeric date processing
> > >
> > > I have it set, to some
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > In number processing, controlled by synthesizer,
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > in both 4.51 and 5.0
> > >
> > > and they both read the same,
> > >
> > > one thousand
> > >
> > > and phone numbers read,
> > >
> > > two hundred thirteen, four hundred six,forty four fifty five
> > >
> > >
> > > if they do not read the same, and they are both set the same way, in
> > > configuration manager,
> > > you might consider running repair on both, and see if they read the
same
> > > with default setting
> > > in a document, with numbers
> > > and change one setting at a time,
> > > in both versions,
> > > i know, it is a pain, to do it methodicly, but it might have to be
done.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Chris Chaffin" <chaffin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > To: <jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Sent: Saturday, May 01, 2004 5:35 AM
> > > Subject: Re: Reading differences between 4.51 and 5.0
> > >
> > >
> > > Hi all,
> > > I also found a difference in how Jaws reads numbers in 4.5x verses
5.0.
> I
> > > currently have both 4.51 and 5.00844 on my system. In my text
settings
> > for
> > > number processing, I have it set to control by synthesizer for both
> > > versions, which is the default setting. For example:
> > > In 4.51, the number one thousand reads correctly, One thousand.
> > > In 5.0, it reads, one zero zero zero.
> > > Now in text processing, there is a setting for number processing to
read
> > > full numbers. This makes Jaws read numbers correctly except when it
> comes
> > > to numbers like phone numbers and social security numbers.
> > > I did call FS and report this difference, but I am not sure any
> correction
> > > will be made.
> > > Chris Chaffin
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: <ptusing@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > To: <jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Sent: Saturday, May 01, 2004 12:55 AM
> > > Subject: Reading differences between 4.51 and 5.0
> > >
> > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > > In Word the numbers twelve and thirteen, for example, are read as
> > > > twelve and thirteen using JAWS 4.5119 but are read as
> > > > one two and one three using 45.0884.
> > > >
> > > > Is there a way to get them read the same?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks and I submitted note to
> > > > support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > about the JAWS halting of speech in Word X P.
> > > > Have a fine week end.
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > To post a message to the list, send it to jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send a message to
> > > jfw-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject
line.
> > > > Archives located at: //www.freelists.org/archives/jfw
> > > >
> > > > If you have any concerns about the list, post received from the
list,
> or
> > > the way the list is being run, do not post them to the list. Rather
> > contact
> > > the list owner at jfw-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > >
> > > --
> > > To post a message to the list, send it to jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send a message to
> > > jfw-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject
line.
> > > Archives located at: //www.freelists.org/archives/jfw
> > >
> > > If you have any concerns about the list, post received from the list,
or
> > the
> > > way the list is being run, do not post them to the list. Rather
contact
> > the
> > > list owner at jfw-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > --
> > > To post a message to the list, send it to jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send a message to
> > jfw-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.
> > > Archives located at: //www.freelists.org/archives/jfw
> > >
> > > If you have any concerns about the list, post received from the list,
or
> > the way the list is being run, do not post them to the list. Rather
> contact
> > the list owner at jfw-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> > --
> > To post a message to the list, send it to jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send a message to
> jfw-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.
> > Archives located at: //www.freelists.org/archives/jfw
> >
> > If you have any concerns about the list, post received from the list, or
> the way the list is being run, do not post them to the list. Rather
contact
> the list owner at jfw-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> --
> To post a message to the list, send it to jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send a message to
jfw-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.
> Archives located at: //www.freelists.org/archives/jfw
>
> If you have any concerns about the list, post received from the list, or
the way the list is being run, do not post them to the list. Rather contact
the list owner at jfw-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
To post a message to the list, send it to jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send a message to
jfw-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.
Archives located at: //www.freelists.org/archives/jfw
If you have any concerns about the list, post received from the list, or the
way the list is being run, do not post them to the list. Rather contact the
list owner at jfw-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Other related posts:
