Re: JFW authorization issue
- From: Chris Skarstad <toonhead5@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2005 17:24:22 -0600
HI
The proper term here is authorization, not verification.
Either way, Microsoft Corporation also requires you to re-activate windows
if any major changes are made, so the statement that no other company or
software program requires you to re-activate, verify or whatever you like
to call it is false. I'm not saying that this is right and I'm not saying
I agree with it. It is just the way things are now. So if you're going to
use Freedom Scientific, or Microsoft products, it's just something you're
going to have to deal with. Sorry to be the one to tel you folks this, but
it's true. YOu do have choices after all, there is Linix to use if you so
choose. I'll stick with windows though, and I don't mind sending them this
information if it helps things run properly. I've got nothing to hide.
At 04:18 PM 3/27/2005, you wrote:
>Thanks.
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "AB7HW Dick Lee Chrisman" <ab7hw@xxxxxxx>
>To: <jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Sent: Sunday, March 27, 2005 2:02 PM
>Subject: Re: New features JFW 6.0. I Dislike the Verification Bug!
>
>
>Hello Jerry
> No Freedom Scientific says nothing specific as to
> what will indicate a need
>to reVerify your JFW 6.0 and why it is necessary they only say that if
>anything changes on YOUR COMPUTER it may require a Verification? This annoy
>me, in that this is my computer and no other company requires you to report
>adding a Hard Drive or even a new sound card, but worst of all if you
>install a floppy Disc Drive you will have to reVerify your JFW program!
>What does this have to do with the operation of JFW!
>The Customer Service person that emailed me about this problem said that my
>Authorization Key count was at 3, of course it was I had written to have my
>count put back to three, which Freedom Scientific had done with in the 24
>hour period, the Customer Service person wrote back 3 days after the email I
>emailed to their department, so of course the Key count was up to three!
>So I don't have any answers just a lot of trouble with the Verification!
>I do not plan to spend more money for a Dongle!
>Dick Chrisman
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Jerry Neufeld" <jerry.neufeld@xxxxxxxxxx>
>To: <jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Sent: Sunday, March 27, 2005 2:03 PM
>Subject: Re: New features JFW 6.0 that I dislike
>
>
> > Hello Dick.
> >
> > I was curious about FS's verification procedure. Do you happen to know
> > what
> > they consider a significcant change in the machine? And if they do come up
> > with what they view a significant change, I assume they allow eloquence to
> > tell you so? If I ask these questions, it is because one of my machines
> > will
> > no longer talk once the desktop comes up, or at least, I think it's up. I
> > will know tomorrow when an assistant confirms my hypothesis that it is the
> > new SoundBlaster audigy platinum that wants registering before it lets me
> > proceed.
> >
> > In any event, any info you have on this issue would be interesting to a
> > lot
> > of us.
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> >
> >
> > Jerry
> > jerry.neufeld@xxxxxxxxxx
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "AB7HW Dick Lee Chrisman" <ab7hw@xxxxxxx>
> > To: <jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Sunday, March 27, 2005 3:50 PM
> > Subject: New features JFW 6.0 that I dislike
> >
> >
> >> One new feature that started with JFW 6.0 is the many times JFW wants to
> >> perform a Verification! It seems like JFW 6.0 seems to think I have made
> >> a
> >> change to MY COMPUTER and I under line MY COMPUTER, I have had to have my
> >> Authorization Keys up dated 10 times or more so far!
> >> So I have to go out and have a email sent to Freedom Scientific to
> >> request
> >> new Keys, in 24 hours or so they do up date my number of Keys, but if I
> >> do
> >> not do this in time I will be running in Demo Mode while being a Legal
> >> paid
> >> up JFW user with additional SMA's paid for!
> >> Freedom Scientific does not argue about providing new Keys, to their
> >> credit!
> >> I wrote Freedom Scientific and ask about, but of course they have never
> >> heard of this complaint or problem?
> >> Today I rebooted or should I say shut off the computer and restarted and
> >> both times it ask for a new Verification and of course removed one Key
> >> for
> >> each occurrence, Poop!
> >> I hope Freedom Scientific finds this to be as big of a Pain to them as it
> >> is
> >> for me and fixes this problem!
> >> I don't think their new way of Verifying users is well thought out, so
> >> that
> >> is my only complaint on the new JFW 6.0!
> >> I look forward to their correcting this dilemma!
> >> Dick Chrisman
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> To post a message to the list, send it to jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send a message to
> >> jfw-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.
> >> Archives located at: //www.freelists.org/archives/jfw
> >>
> >> If you have any concerns about the list, post received from the list, or
> >> the way the list is being run, do not post them to the list. Rather
> >> contact the list owner at jfw-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> > --
> > To post a message to the list, send it to jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send a message to
> > jfw-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.
> > Archives located at: //www.freelists.org/archives/jfw
> >
> > If you have any concerns about the list, post received from the list, or
> > the way the list is being run, do not post them to the list. Rather
> > contact the list owner at jfw-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>--
>To post a message to the list, send it to jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send a message to
>jfw-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.
>Archives located at: //www.freelists.org/archives/jfw
>
>If you have any concerns about the list, post received from the list, or the
>way the list is being run, do not post them to the list. Rather contact the
>list owner at jfw-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
>--
>No virus found in this incoming message.
>Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
>Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.8.3 - Release Date: 3/25/2005
>
>
>
>
>--
>No virus found in this outgoing message.
>Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
>Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.8.3 - Release Date: 3/25/2005
>
>--
>To post a message to the list, send it to jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send a message to
>jfw-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.
>Archives located at: //www.freelists.org/archives/jfw
>
>If you have any concerns about the list, post received from the list, or
>the way the list is being run, do not post them to the list. Rather
>contact the list owner at jfw-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
To post a message to the list, send it to jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send a message to
jfw-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.
Archives located at: //www.freelists.org/archives/jfw
If you have any concerns about the list, post received from the list, or the
way the list is being run, do not post them to the list. Rather contact the
list owner at jfw-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Other related posts:
