Re: Freedom Scientific, Inc. Asked to Cease Lawsuit Against Serotek Corporation

  • From: "Adrian Spratt" <A.Spratt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 00:32:18 -0400


The word "trademark" appears all over the court filing. What is your basis? Or 
is it as flimsy as your leap from FS's CEO Richard Chandler's last name to your 
assertion that he is from the L.A. Times family, which you failed to back up 
the other day?

If you happened to be right about your claim, we'd all be up in arms.  But pure 
speculation, with no supporting facts at all, is counterproductive.  You only 
confirm that Darrell has no case.

----- Original Message -----
From: Kelly Pierce


the lawsuit is not about trademark infringement. Apparently FS's new private 
equity owners are so hungry for money, they will sue anyone if they think they 
can get a bigger settlement than what they paid for the lawyers. most 
significantly, the Freedom Box company has new and innovative technology that 
allows blind people to access computers remotely or portably in a seamless way. 
rather than innovate and match the competition, it was probably deemed by FS 
that an aggressive lawsuit could severely weaken this competitor or put them 
out of business.

In this country, loads of folks jump into the courtroom to achieve aims that 
have nothing to do with the merits of the case.


Other related posts: