Well
if freedomscientific didn't have such a bad attitude,
and write people off I wouldn't be so unkind.
Joseph. Adrian
----- Original Message -----
From: "Adrian Spratt" <A.Spratt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, December 04, 2005 12:27 PM
Subject: Re: Forced to switch to JFW Pro
Although this list is rightly focused on technology problems and solutions, I've noticed two opposing attitudes that color our approaches to these issues: caveat emptor and caveat vendor, that is, buyer beware and seller beware. There's no question that we must do our homework before obtaining new systems and software. On the other hand, I find as a JAWS user that I need to know more about computers than my sighted friends do. As with my sighted friends, I'm torn between needing to know enough about computers to make them serve my purposes and having my computer take over my life.
In that light, while we're responsible for taking the steps we can to ensure that anything we do with our computers is compatible with JAWS, we must hold Freedom Scientific accountable for keeping us well informed about compatibility issues and for maintaining JAWS's ability to handle developments. If we do our part, we have a right to expect FS to do theirs.
--
To post a message to the list, send it to jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send a message to jfw-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.
Archives located at: //www.freelists.org/archives/jfw
If you have any concerns about the list, post received from the list, or the way the list is being run, do not post them to the list. Rather contact the list owner at jfw-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
-- To post a message to the list, send it to jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send a message to jfw-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line. Archives located at: //www.freelists.org/archives/jfw
