RE: CashManager Home version Was RE: Coding for quickbooks

  • From: "George B" <gbmagoo@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 3 May 2011 11:52:24 -0700

ok there are those of who need quicken home / business and quick books and do 
want cash manager 
 
From: jfw-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:jfw-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of 
Richard P. Kelly
Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2011 11:04
To: jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: CashManager Home version Was RE: Coding for quickbooks
 
Hi Peter,
 
Might I suggest you look at the trial version of CashManager for home users.  
It retails for fifty dollars and is very accessible out of the box with Jaws.
 
I’ve even trialed it on a Win 98 PC with Jaws 5.10 and it performed very well.  
It’s an excellent alternative to Quicken for those who wish to track bank 
accounts, credit cards, expenses, print checks and reports.  And, it works very 
well without scripting.
 
HTH
 
Cordially,
Richard P. Kelly
rpkelly@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
rich@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
www.new-visions-network.com
 
From: jfw-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:jfw-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of 
Peter Holdstock
Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2011 12:37 PM
To: jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Coding for quickbooks
 
I think scripting one of the home versions would make more sense as that’s the 
version the average person is likely to use and would benefit from the most as 
many blind people are just managing on limited incomes.
 
Peter
 
From: George B <mailto:gbmagoo@xxxxxxxxxxx>  
Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2011 1:52 PM
To: jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
Subject: RE: Coding for quickbooks
 
quick books is the full version which a lot of small business and just business 
in general use, but a lot of folks use quicken home and business which has a 
lot of the quick books capabilities in it and structured the same as  quick 
books
 
From: jfw-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:jfw-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of 
John Martyn
Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2011 03:58
To: jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Coding for quickbooks
 
One thing I also might mention is because quickbooks is updated every year; I 
would have to make this a lasting project and not let it go stale. Each year 
the script will have to change and older scripts might not work with the new 
release; so these would not be backwards compatible scripts. It is possible 
they could work with older versions; but I can't guarantee the year to year 
versions will be the same. I would start with the latest meaning quickbooks 
2011. I would keep this project going by possibly charging for the scripts. 
Nothing outrageous; just enough to keep development for the future. I don't 
know of other possibilities of getting the project funded every year; but 
perhaps this is where other organizations will come in. I haven't charged for 
scripts before; so this is new to me. This would definitely make for better 
support; but the scripts would have to remain closed source unless I sell the 
rights to them. I am aware that this might make us run out to get the latest 
version; so another charge to make it accessible doesn't seem fair in the 
beginning. If I got it funded by kick start; the first year would be free; 
while the following years would have a price to them to keep it going since 
this is a monster of a program.; Let me know your thoughts on this.; John Martyn


__________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature 
database 6091 (20110503) __________

The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.

http://www.eset.com

Other related posts: