Re: Admin: The recent FS thread
- From: Chris Skarstad <toonhead5@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 07 May 2004 18:09:28 -0500
What I don't understand in this whole situation is why this guy needed 10
authorization keys in the first place? At first a floppy came with 3 keys,
and then FS upped that number to 5. The only, and I mean *only* reason I
can think of to get an extra key disc is for backup purposes. But if you
are a responsible human being and keep your key disc in a safe place, you
won't even need 2 discs. I think this guy's complaints are just that,
complaints. He got a working auth key and that's a lot more than some
people get when trying to install JAWS on their computers. If he had been
given a defective key I'm sure FS would've replaced it but again this guy's
complaint holds no water for me.
At 12:47 PM 5/7/2004, you wrote:
>Hay Jim thanks for that! I didn't want to seem like I was speaking out of
>turn! I just thought that complaint should be brot to FS's attention not
>here! So that's enough of that lets talk about JFWS!
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Quanin" <quanin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>To: <jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Sent: Friday, May 07, 2004 12:42 PM
>Subject: Admin: The recent FS thread
>
>
> > As of right now, the user who began the Freedom Scientific disapproval
> > thread has been delt with. I'll now take a minute to remind *everyone*
>that
> > we are not an FS-affiliated list, and therefore problems with FS should
>not
> > be directed here, but to FS themselves. We are, as I've said before,
> > roughly 90% JFW users at home, and 60% JFW users at work as well.
> > Therefore, while we may share some of the same concerns as you, we cannot
> > and will not attempt to provide an official answer to your problems.
> > Instead, we will work toward helping you deal with them as we have.
> > However, if it'san official/proffessional answer you're looking for, it
> > should go directly to FS. We are all volunteers on this list. No one's
> > paying us for what we do to help out, we've just all been there at one
> > point or another. The idea of this list has always been good, clean
> > discussion. While the occasional debate/argument will undoubtedly break
> > out, and there's very little any of us, moderator or not, can do to stop
> > it, even that has limits. This recent thread has passed those limits by a
> > considerable measure. Let's hope what happened the last few hours will
> > serve to remind everyone that, while our intentions may be nothing but the
> > best, even an unproffessional list has to possess some degree of
>diplomacy.
> >
> > James,
> > List Admin
> >
> >
> > --
> > To post a message to the list, send it to jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send a message to
>jfw-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.
> > Archives located at: //www.freelists.org/archives/jfw
> >
> > If you have any concerns about the list, post received from the list, or
>the way the list is being run, do not post them to the list. Rather contact
>the list owner at jfw-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
>
>
>--
>To post a message to the list, send it to jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send a message to
>jfw-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.
>Archives located at: //www.freelists.org/archives/jfw
>
>If you have any concerns about the list, post received from the list, or
>the way the list is being run, do not post them to the list. Rather
>contact the list owner at jfw-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
To post a message to the list, send it to jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send a message to
jfw-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.
Archives located at: //www.freelists.org/archives/jfw
If you have any concerns about the list, post received from the list, or the
way the list is being run, do not post them to the list. Rather contact the
list owner at jfw-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Other related posts:
