Re: Admin: Moderators Saught

  • From: "Sean McMahon" <smcmahon@xxxxxxxx>
  • To: <jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 11:22:36 -0700

Does this mean messages will now be reviewed by moderator before posting?
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Kathleen A. Millhoff" <kmilhoff@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: <jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, January 17, 2005 11:50 PM
Subject: RE: Admin: Moderators Saught


Hi,  as someone who hasn't contributed much to the list except in the way of
questions, may I humbly request that your choice include not only
knowledgeable people but also those who write back with some consideration
for those of us who aren't as technically proficient.  I have had the
difficult experience, as have others, of receiving posts from list
participants who answered in a mean, sarcastic, or condescending manner.
I know this may not seem altogether pertinent among adults, but you did
mention professionalism, and in the workplace I know, there's no space for
that kind of behavior.
Thanks for reading.
best to you and all,
and thanks for your hard work,
kat

-----Original Message-----
From: jfw-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:jfw-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On
Behalf Of James
Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2005 4:17 PM
To: jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Admin: Moderators Saught


Recent lack of communication from me to the list has lead me to the
decision that I no longer can run the list on my own. That said, I have no
intention of turning the list over to anyone. However, I am in search of 2
or 3 people who, to a degree, can act as policy enforcers/list moderators.
What this means is this:
1: You will not have total say on list administration, or policy
enforcement.
2: You will not be able to simply remove a user without reason, and
confirmation from the rest of the staff.
3: You are expected to act as professionally as if you were in fact being
payed to do this. We are in no way a professional organization, but we are
the largest dedicated support group for JFW that I am currently aware of.
We have an example to set.
4: All interested parties will contact me no later than Friday, the 21 of
January.

Requests will be reviewed on a case by case basis, and those who have been
selected will hear from me by Febuary 1. Those who have not been selected
will simply not receive notification. As always, if there are any
questions, feel free to email me off-list.

James,
List Admin


--
To post a message to the list, send it to jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send a message to
jfw-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.
Archives located at: //www.freelists.org/archives/jfw

If you have any concerns about the list, post received from the list, or the
way the list is being run, do not post them to the list. Rather contact the
list owner at jfw-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

--
To post a message to the list, send it to jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send a message to
jfw-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.
Archives located at: //www.freelists.org/archives/jfw

If you have any concerns about the list, post received from the list, or the way
the list is being run, do not post them to the list. Rather contact the list
owner at jfw-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

--
To post a message to the list, send it to jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send a message to 
jfw-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.
Archives located at: //www.freelists.org/archives/jfw

If you have any concerns about the list, post received from the list, or the 
way the list is being run, do not post them to the list. Rather contact the 
list owner at jfw-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Other related posts: