Re: A suggestion for the "Free list"
- From: Quanin <quanin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2004 23:16:13 -0500
Two things with that suggestion.
Firstly, because there is a delay between when you send a message to the
list and when it sends it to everyone else, people may not always know that
someone else is replyiing to it. Secondly, what *is* a sufficient answer?
As I'm fond of saying... you can never have too much information.
James
At 10:52 PM 21/02/2004 -0800, you wrote:
>Hi list,
>It's really good that we all are attempting to help each other by
>clarifying various JAWS related issues. But can we look at other messages
>from the list before answering to any question? I am making this point, so
>as to avoid filling our mail boxes with something, that has already been
>answered sufficiently.
>
>Vetri.
>--
>To post a message to the list, send it to jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send a message to
>jfw-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.
>
>If you have any concerns about the list, post received from the list, or
>the way the list is being run, do not post them to the list. Rather
>contact the list owner at jfw-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
To post a message to the list, send it to jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send a message to
jfw-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.
If you have any concerns about the list, post received from the list, or the
way the list is being run, do not post them to the list. Rather contact the
list owner at jfw-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Other related posts:
