I don't understand your position. Isn't changing a window classification (2 lines added to a jcf file) less intrusive and cleaner than writing a custom script to an application that already has scripts? On 6/25/2012 9:57 AM, Doug Lee wrote: > I should sort of warn you that it is a bit trickier to script an > application that Freedom Scientific has already scripted, because you > have to make sure that your own scripts mesh properly with those that > already come with JAWS. Word is such a case: FS includes Word scripts > with JAWS, so you would have to work your scripts in with theirs. This > can be done in a couple of ways, each having its pros and cons. > > First though, I think it would be most useful to us if you could tell > us what functionality you want to add by writing scripts. That might > help us figure out the best way to make it happen. If you just want to > add some commands of your own, it really won't matter much which way > you do it. If you're trying to alter JAWS' behavior as you do things, > add or modify automatic speech, or do anything else that might involve > intercepting a JAWS event, it will be time to talk about chaining > script files together. > > On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 02:48:49PM +0100, David Newman wrote: > Oh dear! As you are the second to ask that, I should say I would love to > write it up but this probably isn't the right place. > Most of what I'm doing is for simple access to frequently used requirements. > Too much of what I'm doing is to defeat stuff. > One day... > > > On 25/06/2012 14:03, Don Mauck wrote: >> what is so bad about word? > __________??? > > View the list's information and change your settings at > //www.freelists.org/list/jawsscripts > __________� View the list's information and change your settings at //www.freelists.org/list/jawsscripts