[jawsscripts] Re: Troubles with iTunes in Win XP

  • From: "John Martyn" <johnrobertmartyn@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <jawsscripts@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 10:18:15 -0700

I actually managed to fix the issue. With Blind Tunes, now you can have
iTunes 10.6 and use windows XP to navigate the preference window. Tricky,
but it was possible after all.
John Martyn

-----Original Message-----
From: jawsscripts-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:jawsscripts-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Kevin Mattingly
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2012 8:01 AM
To: jawsscripts@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [jawsscripts] Re: Troubles with iTunes in Win XP

The solution is to buy Apple. It just works, at least most of the time.

Kev
On Mar 14, 2012, at 10:14 AM, Christopher Chaltain wrote:

> Well, I'm not sure I agree. Obviously, Apple felt it was important 
> enough to port iTune to Windows, and I suspect this was to drive sales 
> of mobile devices and products through the iTunes store, but Apple is 
> still competing with MS in the PC/laptop space, and last I knew they 
> were gaining. With the explosion of mobile devices and the popularity 
> of Apple's devices for consuming content, I'd actually be surprised if 
> most of the iTunes store sales don't stem from Apple's own devices and 
> not from iTunes running on Windows.
> 
> Although I can see Apple's decision to port iTune to Windows being a 
> good business decision in the short term, I don't know that this 
> extends to the accessibility of iTunes on Windows. If, as you said, 
> Apple cares about the usability of iTunes on Windows because of the 
> teency number of Macs out there then this would be even more true of 
> the number of blind people using iTunes on Windows. After all, we are 
> a teency percentage of the overall population. Besides, Apple offers 
> an accessible alternative, iTunes with VoiceOver, and with their 
> commitment to accessibility on their own platforms, they've garnered a 
> lot of good will in the blindness community.
> 
> I can easily see Apple taking the position that they're spending 
> enough resources making their own platforms accessible and that they 
> don't get enough return on their investment to wade into the 
> fragmented space of screen readers and accessibility on the Windows 
> side. Besides, IMHO, it won't be too long before people are buying 
> their PC's and laptops because of what works well with their mobile 
> devices and not the other way around. Predictions are tough in this 
> space, but I wouldn't be surprised if Apple drops support of iTunes on
Windows altogether.
> 
> One of the reasons I brought up this point, although tongue in cheek, 
> is because this is one of the pitfalls I see when a OS/application 
> company like Apple gets into the screen reader business. What 
> incentive do they have to have their technology accessible with other 
> screen readers or to have their screen reader support competitor's 
> applications? It's great if you're going all Apple, but if you're 
> going to mix and match then you're going to run into problems like 
> these. I think the fact that accessibility of iTunes on Windows is 
> frequently playing catch up with new releases of iTunes on Windows goes a
long way to proving my point.
> 
> On 14/03/12 07:17, Geoff Chapman wrote:
>> hmmmm, well, my understanding would've been, that their motivation to 
>> make this a good user-experience under windows, could, possibly, have 
>> stemmed from the fact, that my understanding was that macs only still 
>> make up a teency percentage of the amount of people actually using 
>> itunes! either to buy stuff from their store, or to transfer stuff to 
>> their IOS devices! and that many of them are blind/vision impaired!  
>> So I'd have thought that would have provided, and I think must've to 
>> some degree, sufficient economic motivation to care about it for 
>> vips.  They own/buy ipods/iPhones and music too. and a great many 
>> more would under windows than on macs with voiceover.
>> would it not be so?
>> I realize you can use the store directly on those devices, and thanks 
>> Trouble for pointing out that's primarily how you get around the 
>> dodgy performance of iTunes store under windows.
>> But, if it wasn't dodgy, and worked well, you'd enjoy utilizing it 
>> there too would not you?
>> 
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Trouble" <trouble1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> To: <jawsscripts@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2012 3:21 AM
>> Subject: [jawsscripts] Re: Troubles with iTunes in Win XP
>> 
>>> It does work with voice over. However, the windows version they are 
>>> not to worried with, because they have few programs for windows. So 
>>> they just make it work with windows. It is up to the makers of 
>>> windows screen readers to handle that job.
>>> 
>>> At 07:32 AM 3/13/2012, you wrote:
>>>> Yeh, but how does it run on a Mac with VoiceOver? I'm sure they 
>>>> test it on their own hardware with their own OS and their own screen
reader.
>>>> I've never been sure what Apple's motivation was to spend resources 
>>>> making iTunes accessible on Windows when they could just respond by 
>>>> telling everyone it works with VoiceOver.
>>>> 
>>>> On 13/03/12 06:19, Geoff Chapman wrote:
>>>>> Far out! Apple seriously drive me insane with what they're always 
>>>>> dooen to break itunes accessibility with nearly every version they 
>>>>> bring out!
>>>>> don't
>>>>> you reckon John?
>>>>> 
>>>>> it's got a serious refreshing conflict/focus syncronization 
>>>>> difficulties already, with jaws I reckon, in the itunes store, 
>>>>> which makes using it a total pain in bottom difficulty, which 
>>>>> either FS or apple reeeally should attend to in my view, fix, and 
>>>>> now they've broken preferences dialog?
>>>>> my
>>>>> goodness.
>>>>> nobody obviously tests each release for this stuff before they 
>>>>> release it eh. why on earth not! I cry. in the
>>>> wilderness no doubt. has anyone ansered
>>>>> you on this email adress you've got here below before John?  Do 
>>>>> they even monitor it realistically?
>>>>> I'll jolly email them as well if so!
>>>>> I've kept itunes 10.3 and jaws 11 on this laptop here for exactly 
>>>>> these reasons! 10.4 they messed around with the tab
>>>> order of where the search box
>>>>> occurred, and then tried to do automatic jumps of focus after 
>>>>> search has completed into the iTunes store, thus meanig that if 
>>>>> you hit f6 then, when it'd done that, in the midst of it trying to 
>>>>> get itself together re the refreshing conflict, you'd crash the 
>>>>> thing sooo jolly easily!
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> grrr!
>>>>> sorry for the rant peeps.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>> From: "John Martyn" <johnrobertmartyn@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> To: <jawsscripts@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2012 11:26 AM
>>>>> Subject: [jawsscripts] Troubles with iTunes in Win XP
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>> This is going to sound a little strange, but now in the 
>>>>>> preferences window, when you tab, it skips all the objects 
>>>>>> contained within that window.
>>>>>> It
>>>>>> only
>>>>>> happens under the first two tabs, but the rest of them work fine. 
>>>>>> This problem started with iTunes 10.6 and happens with or without 
>>>>>> the blind tunes scripts.
>>>>>> My question is, can I walk through focusing objects if I know the 
>>>>>> window handle of the preference window? I was thinking for XP 
>>>>>> systems, I could create a tab and shift tab key script that will 
>>>>>> walk through the objects, but I don't see any function that could 
>>>>>> do this. I am really at a loss as to what I can do for XP systems 
>>>>>> other than email accessibility@xxxxxxxxx and pray they hear my 
>>>>>> message.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> The tab key as it is in XP just jumps to SDM controls though you 
>>>>>> can change the tabs just fine. I am guessing apple removed the 
>>>>>> tab index somehow.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> What should I do? If I can fix it for XP systems, I'd like to 
>>>>>> because apple most likely isn't going to do something for the old 
>>>>>> XP operating system.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Any advice would be greatly appreciated.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I am using the focusChangedEventX to work with the object 
>>>>>> elements. If I use the objectStateChanged Event iTunes goes nuts 
>>>>>> and doesn't respond.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Thanks in advance,
> 
> --
> Christopher (CJ)
> chaltain@xxxxxxxxx
> __________�
> 
> View the list's information and change your settings at 
> //www.freelists.org/list/jawsscripts
> 

__________�

View the list's information and change your settings at
//www.freelists.org/list/jawsscripts

__________�

View the list's information and change your settings at 
//www.freelists.org/list/jawsscripts

Other related posts: