<4B68A88C.8050807@xxxxxxxxxx> Peter Naulls wrote: > On 02 Feb, <rickman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> I think that Resolver is not working on my Iyonix 5.16. > ... > The first question is if you have proper connectivity, > and indeed ping to an IP address would be a start, > but might not be everything (it is ICMP, not UDP > for starters). Also look at the status of *ekinfo. *ping 192.168.1.1 PING 192.168.1.1 (192.168.1.1): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=0 ttl=255 time=0 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=255 time=0 ms *ekinfo EtherK device driver for Intel PRO/1000 network controllers, vers 0.21 DCI Version 4.05 Supported network cards detected: 1 Unit 0 (location: Motherboard) Ethernet address 00:09:95:00:15:C8 Link is up; 100 Mbps Full Duplex Controller mode: Multicast, reject frames with errors Frame types claimed: Ethernet 0800 (multicast) handler=(FC2EC5AC,FB40743C) Ethernet 0806 (normal) handler=(FC2EC5AC,FB40743C) Ethernet 8035 (normal) handler=(FC2EC5AC,FB40743C) Hardware statistics summary: TX frames 23 : RX frames 2 TX bytes 1,826 : RX bytes 158 TX errors 0 : RX errors 0 > Beyond that, if you can try and repeat the resolution > using ping to a name address (e.g, google.com) and > see if you get the failure. If you can cause it > to repeat somehow, then you might have a clue > about what is going on. Here is the result of pinging gmail.com by name and by numeric address:- *ping www.gmail.com ping: unknown host www.gmail.com *ping 74.125.79.109 PING 74.125.79.109 (74.125.79.109): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 74.125.79.109: icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=50 ms 64 bytes from 74.125.79.109: icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=40 ms John -- Midland User Group - http://mug.riscos.org No sé nada, y no estoy incluso seguro de ése. --- To alter your preferences or leave the group, visit //www.freelists.org/list/iyonix-support Other info via //www.freelists.org/webpage/iyonix-support