[iyonix-support] Re: File-core limit of 256GB - is it on the list?
- From: rickman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- To: iyonix-support@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 18:09:59 +0100
<4B718C45.8000007@xxxxxxxxxx>
Peter Naulls wrote:
> rickman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>> The real problem with using NAS for backup is filing system
>> incompatibilities between RISC OS and Linux.
>>
>> Among others, filenames starting with /, file names containing >, and
>> file names ending ,xxx can cause backup jobs to abort.
> This is a failure with LanMan98, etc, not RISC OS in general. I think
> this has already been pointed out several times. More here:
> http://www.riscos.info/index.php/RISC_OS_Filename_Translation
Thanks - a useful article. I have a better understanding of the
possible problems and solutions having read it.
> There's no reason this couldn't be done robustly, and indeed is
> in for example. SunFish.
Unfortunately the NAS box (LinkSys NSLU2) runs SMB not NFS and the
mounts are therefore not visible to SunFish.
The SLU2 as delivered does not have a command interface.
Installing applications requires fairly serious hacking.
John
> ---
> To alter your preferences or leave the group,
> visit //www.freelists.org/list/iyonix-support
> Other info via //www.freelists.org/webpage/iyonix-support
--
Midland User Group - http://mug.riscos.org
RISC OS the platform that puts the arch into anarchic;-( "Anarchy
means having to put up with things that really piss you off" Usenet
faq
---
To alter your preferences or leave the group,
visit //www.freelists.org/list/iyonix-support
Other info via //www.freelists.org/webpage/iyonix-support
Other related posts:
