In message of 7 Feb, tennant@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Tennant Stuart) wrote: > In message Tim Powys-Lybbe wrote: <snip> > > But it is the same object on both discs. When the copy command looks at > > one it says it is a file and when the same command looks at the other it > > says it is a directory. This is inconsistent - and is what I am trying > > to point out. If there was no such inconsistency, copying could proceed > > satisfactorily and my backups likewise. > > I'm afraid I don't understand this discussion at all. > > If I get SparkFS to create a "directory" called NEWZIP, then the following > line in a Basic program (or an Obey file) works perfectly well... > > *COPY TEXTFILE NEWZIP.TEXTFILE F ~V ~C > > Both the Iyonix & RiscPC are good, and either TEXTFILE can be the newer. The original note explained that I was effectively using the command COPY 4.$.* 5.$.* to copy the whole of one disc to another for backup purposes. This aborts if any of the archive programs (sparkfs, etc) or CDROMFS are running, that is, I was told, any program that maintained an image system. Renaming as you suggested is not an option here. Unfortunately the fashion for snipping has lost all this, but you can go back to the start here: //www.freelists.org/archives/iyonix-support/01-2007/msg00168.html -- Tim Powys-Lybbe tim@xxxxxxxxx For a miscellany of bygones: http://powys.org/ --- To alter your preferences or leave the group, visit //www.freelists.org/list/iyonix-support Other info via //www.freelists.org/webpage/iyonix-support