[isapros] Re: Un-Pro Question
- From: "Amy Babinchak" <amy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <isapros@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2006 08:20:46 -0400
Maybe. That would explain a lot of things. :)
He wants me to fly down. I'm going to decline. Sounds like a can of
worms and I can't get into a week long project down there. A day or two
would be fine but I've got a sinking feeling that once I get down there
I'd be there for a while. A screwed up WAN is a bad, bad thing.
-----Original Message-----
From: isapros-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:isapros-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Jim Harrison
Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2006 7:44 PM
To: isapros@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [isapros] Re: Un-Pro Question
Oh, my dear God!!
Were you bad in a past life?
Sent via WM5-enabled PPC-phone
-----Original Message-----
From: "Amy Babinchak" <amy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: isapros@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: 6/15/06 15:42
Subject: [isapros] Re: Un-Pro Question
In San Antonio there is apparently a local community college teacher
that was hired to "secure" the network. When he failed horribly they
hired someone else. When that person failed the new guy in called me.
(probably because you guys are all in Boston) I remind everyone not to
take community college IT security courses in Texas.
DNS was configured for .net. Which is owned by a Korean company and not
the client. There was a Sonicwall sitting in front of ISA that had both
NIC configured with the same IP. On ISA all system policies where
enabled, had all network objects in the TO and FROM areas and he had 52
firewall policies created. Imagine if you will...the client computers
were unable to use the Internet and receive email.
I got as far as reconfiguring DNS and DHCP, removing the extra objects
from the system policies, disabling the ones that are disabled by
default, created the basic 5 rules, set the NIC binding order and remove
the extra stuff bound to those adapters. I was testing email and getting
ready to add those rules when 1:00am rolled around and my Comcast line
went dead. Call it a night and nothing....bummer.
-----Original Message-----
From: isapros-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:isapros-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Jim Harrison
Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2006 3:30 PM
To: isapros@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [isapros] Re: Un-Pro Question
..it does, but only if it's been configured prior to the failure.
-------------------------------------------------------
Jim Harrison
MCP(NT4, W2K), A+, Network+, PCG
http://isaserver.org/Jim_Harrison/
http://isatools.org
Read the help / books / articles!
-------------------------------------------------------
-----Original Message-----
From: isapros-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:isapros-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Amy Babinchak
Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2006 15:15
To: isapros@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [isapros] Re: Un-Pro Question
So System policy doesn't come into play for RDP? And all
All mail to and from this domain is GFI-scanned.
Other related posts: