[isapros] Re: RPC Question
- From: "Jason Jones" <Jason.Jones@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <isapros@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 02:13:39 +0100
Ok, so question of "you wanna be prompted?" or "you wanna have two
listeners/IP/certs?"
-----Original Message-----
From: isapros-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:isapros-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Jim Harrison
Sent: 06 September 2007 02:03
To: isapros@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [isapros] Re: RPC Question
Yep - and various forms of FBA, too.
They'll have to use multiple listeners if they want to support more than
OL RPC/HTTP.
-----Original Message-----
From: isapros-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:isapros-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Jason Jones
Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2007 5:59 PM
To: isapros@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [isapros] Re: RPC Question
Ah...using a single listener so guess FBA cannot fallback to NTLM only
basic fallback - yes?
-----Original Message-----
From: isapros-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:isapros-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Jim Harrison
Sent: 06 September 2007 01:46
To: isapros@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [isapros] Re: RPC Question
You get to play with KCD!
I hope they operate a Win2K3 Native domain...
-----Original Message-----
From: isapros-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:isapros-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Amy Babinchak
Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2007 5:51 PM
To: isapros@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [isapros] Re: RPC Question
Of course there is and it's the usual one. The CEO doesn't want to type
in his password every time he uses Outlook.
-----Original Message-----
From: isapros-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:isapros-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Thomas W Shinder
Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2007 8:24 PM
To: isapros@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [isapros] Re: RPC Question
Maybe a more important queston is:
"Why do you want to use Integrated Authentication at the Web Proxy
Listener"
Since the Basic credentails are hidden in SSL tunnels, it shouldn't
matter. Or is there another "hidden requirement" which is the actual
basis of the question?
:)
Tom
Thomas W Shinder, M.D.
Site: www.isaserver.org
Blog: http://blogs.isaserver.org/shinder/
Book: http://tinyurl.com/3xqb7
MVP -- Microsoft Firewalls (ISA)
> -----Original Message-----
> From: isapros-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:isapros-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jim Harrison
> Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2007 7:18 PM
> To: isapros@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [isapros] Re: RPC Question
>
> Silly wabbit...
> This is an ISA 2006 deployment; none of that SBS/ISA2004
> Basic-delegation-only silliness.
>
> Amy - you need to get familiar with eth chart at the bottom of this
> page:
> http://www.microsoft.com/technet/isa/2006/authentication.mspx
>
> Also, if you're thinking about adding EAS clients, you're limited to
> using either Basic or ClientCert auth.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: isapros-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:isapros-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> On Behalf Of Thomas W Shinder
> Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2007 5:10 PM
> To: isapros@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [isapros] Re: RPC Question
>
> So as to avoid a can of worms that can't be opened.
>
> Thomas W Shinder, M.D.
> Site: www.isaserver.org
> Blog: http://blogs.isaserver.org/shinder/
> Book: http://tinyurl.com/3xqb7
> MVP -- Microsoft Firewalls (ISA)
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: isapros-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > [mailto:isapros-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jim Harrison
> > Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2007 7:08 PM
> > To: isapros@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: [isapros] Re: RPC Question
> >
> > Why for you be says dat?
> > Snot true...
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: isapros-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > [mailto:isapros-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> > On Behalf Of Thomas W Shinder
> > Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2007 4:18 PM
> > To: isapros@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: [isapros] Re: RPC Question
> >
> > YOU MUST USE BASIC. That is a requirement.
> >
> > Thomas W Shinder, M.D.
> > Site: www.isaserver.org
> > Blog: http://blogs.isaserver.org/shinder/
> > Book: http://tinyurl.com/3xqb7
> > MVP -- Microsoft Firewalls (ISA)
> >
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: isapros-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > [mailto:isapros-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Amy Babinchak
> > > Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2007 6:15 PM
> > > To: isapros@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > Subject: [isapros] RPC Question
> > >
> > > I'm working on an ISA 2006 machine with an Exchange 2003
> > server behind
> > > it to publish Outlook Anywhere. I used the wizard to create
> > > the rule. If
> > > I select Basic Authentication (on both ISA and IIS) the
> > > publishing rule
> > > works. If I use NTLM (on ISA and IIS) it doesn't. I get ISA
> > > Denied logs
> > > reason 12239. Does it not support NTLM authentication?
> > >
> > > Since this works with Basic I know I don't have certificate
> > > issues and I
> > > know it can authenticate usernames, passwords and find its
> > way to the
> > > mailbox.
> > >
> > > Amy
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > All mail to and from this domain is GFI-scanned.
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> All mail to and from this domain is GFI-scanned.
>
>
>
>
All mail to and from this domain is GFI-scanned.
All mail to and from this domain is GFI-scanned.
Other related posts:
