[isapros] Re: RDP v6.0 Client Certificate configuration
- From: "Greg Mulholland" <gmulholland@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <isapros@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 20:52:13 +1000
I hope john's watching this, he loves it when you two go at it..
Greg
-----Original Message-----
From: isapros-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:isapros-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Thor (Hammer of God)
Sent: Tuesday, 28 August 2007 11:58 PM
To: isapros@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [isapros] Re: RDP v6.0 Client Certificate configuration
> Here's the bottom line, Poindexter: I'm lucky enough to work with some
> really smart people (I reluctantly include you in that list ;) And when
> it takes us all several goes at something to test and we all end up
> scratching our heads saying "hmmm, that's not the way that's supposed
> to work" then there's something to that. So drop it!! :-p
>
> [Jim] - Finally; I've moved up to "reluctantly smart"! :-p Yep - I was
> scratching my head right alongside you until I realized that I'd let
> myself be drawn into your interpretation of some (surprisingly clear
> for MS) UI text. When I went back and actually read it, the meaning
> was clear (if only in retrospect). I'll grant you that it doesn't pop
> up a four-paragraph warning with a pissed off paperclip warning the
> user that "If I can't reach Exchange using HTTP, I'll fall back to TCP;
> are you ok with that?, followed by "Are you sure?", then "are you
> really, really sure?"...
It's amazing you've stayed married this long... Are you actually trying to use
the "I'm not taking about what happens if do you do or don't check the
checkbox, but only what the checkbox text says" as support for your argument?
I understand the "use TCP if HTTP fails" logic (though they still could have
worded it better. I'm saying that even when you *don't* check that, it *does
it* anyway. You know, after all this, I think I will indeed follow your advice
and talk to my kids about it. Even the 6 year old listens ;)))))
t
Other related posts:
