Yes. On 7/2/06 6:06 AM, "Thomas W Shinder" <tshinder@xxxxxxxxxxx> spoketh to all: > Are they are primary partitions? > > Thomas W Shinder, M.D. > Site: www.isaserver.org > Blog: http://blogs.isaserver.org/shinder/ > Book: http://tinyurl.com/3xqb7 > MVP -- ISA Firewalls > > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: isapros-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> [mailto:isapros-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Thor >> (Hammer of God) >> Sent: Saturday, July 01, 2006 1:22 PM >> To: isapros@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> Subject: [isapros] Re: OT: The Most Powerful PC on the Planet! >> >> >> Well, I'm about to dive in and see how well it goes. Should >> be interesting >> have "Server" as my client OS ;) Too bad you can't upgrade >> from XP Pro to >> Server... That would have made the testing a bit easier. >> >> Anyone else have issues when doing multiple boots with >> multiple SATA/SATA2 >> drives? No matter what drives/partitions I choose to install >> a new OS on a >> different partition, the modified boot.ini always uses a >> signature() in the >> boot path rather than the multi() syntax, and it never boots into the >> install bits. Manually changing the path to specifying the proper >> drive/partition works to boot into the install, but I always >> get the dreaded >> x7b stop error after that. This is true regardless of the >> Win OS being >> installed and probably due to bad mojo on the references to >> the sys drivers. >> >> I actually have to disconnect all my other drives to get a >> "clean" install, >> at which point I go and edit the boot.ini on my original C: >> to boot into the >> OS. That works fine, but doing it that way makes me feel >> like I'm sportin' >> a shanker. >> >> t >> >> >> >> >> On 7/1/06 7:11 AM, "Thomas W Shinder" <tshinder@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> spoketh to all: >> >>> Yep, looks like that's where I'm going too. I'm tired of waiting for >>> these VMs to sure a lousy 4GB memory and two procs. >>> >>> Thomas W Shinder, M.D. >>> Site: www.isaserver.org >>> Blog: http://blogs.isaserver.org/shinder/ >>> Book: http://tinyurl.com/3xqb7 >>> MVP -- ISA Firewalls >>> >>> >>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: isapros-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>> [mailto:isapros-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Thor >>>> (Hammer of God) >>>> Sent: Friday, June 30, 2006 6:50 PM >>>> To: isapros@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>> Subject: [isapros] Re: OT: The Most Powerful PC on the Planet! >>>> >>>> Then I'll still be in the "no drivers, limited software" >>>> environment. Looks >>>> like there won't be any perceivable (or real, for that >>>> matter) performance >>>> difference between the two, yet I'll get full memory support and my >>>> preferred environment out of x32 Ent. >>>> >>>> I'll just have to see how the drivers go... >>>> >>>> Stay tuned! >>>> >>>> >>>> On 6/30/06 3:19 PM, "Steve Moffat" <steve@xxxxxxxxxx> >> spoketh to all: >>>> >>>>> What about Ent 64 bit? >>>>> >>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>> From: isapros-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>> [mailto:isapros-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] >>>>> On Behalf Of Thor (Hammer of God) >>>>> Sent: Friday, June 30, 2006 7:08 PM >>>>> To: isapros@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; Thor; Young, Gerald G >>>>> Subject: [isapros] Re: OT: The Most Powerful PC on the Planet! >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> http://news.softpedia.com/news/Windows-versus-Windows-or-32-bi >>>> t-versus-6 >>>>> 4bit >>>>> -1349.shtml >>>>> >>>>> This is an interesting benchmark test between x32 and x64 >>>> bit. I may be >>>>> stuck in "x64 is way mo betta" for no reason. From a speed >>>> standpoint, >>>>> anyway... >>>>> >>>>> So, Ent Ed on this guy might actually be the way to go. >> And in all >>>>> actuality, I wouldn't really need to worry about loading >>>> virtual server >>>>> on it anyway, as I would just load everything into that instance. >>>>> >>>>> I'll see if everything loads properly... Good call Gerald. Thanks. >>>>> >>>>> t >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 6/30/06 2:36 PM, "Thor (Hammer of God)" <thor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>>> spoketh to >>>>> all: >>>>> >>>>>> Now that's an interesting idea... Load Enterprise Ed of >>>> Win2k3 to take >>>>> >>>>>> advantage of all the RAM while still being able to have the full >>>>>> experience of sound, preferred apps, video preferences, etc. >>>>>> >>>>>> So, I'd loose the x64 environment, but keep all the goodies while >>>>>> still using Virtual Server the way I want to. Plus have >>>> the benefits >>>>>> of having "Server" running. Hmmm. Not bad. >>>>>> >>>>>> So the question now becomes, "how much faster is x64 than x32?" >>>>>> >>>>>> Anyone? >>>>>> >>>>>> t >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On 6/30/06 2:24 PM, "Young, Gerald G" <Gerald.Young@xxxxxxxxxx> >>>>>> spoketh to >>>>>> all: >>>>>> >>>>>>> FedEx it to me? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Put *nix on it and try to get wine to work with your >> Window apps? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Try Vista, which may or may not support 8 GB of memory (can't >>>>> remember). >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Use W2K3 Enterprise (x32) and keep most, if not all other >>>>>>> functionality? The server OS is a pretty stable game >>>> platform since >>>>>>> almost all XP drivers work on it (or at least they have for me). >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Enterprise shouldn't set you back too far since you can >>>> afford that >>>>>>> beast of a rig you got. :) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You could also take up the hobby of 3D rendering or graphical >>>>>>> editing, if they aren't already hobbies of yours. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You could also probably put that puppy to work with the >>>> SETI screen >>>>> saver. >>>>>>> Who knows, you might actually find THE signal. :) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> While I'm envious (from a gaming perspective) I look at buying >>>>>>> something like that akin to buying a mansion to live in >>>> when you're >>>>>>> single. What ARE you going to do with it? :) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Not to mention, can you imagine cleaning a mansion by yourself?! >>>>>>> Cordially yours, >>>>>>> Jerry G. Young II +From Blackberry+ >>>>>>> MCSE (4.0/W2K) >>>>>>> Atlanta EES Implementation Team Lead >>>>>>> ECNS Microsoft Engineering >>>>>>> Unisys >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 11493 Sunset Hills Rd. >>>>>>> Reston, VA 20190 >>>>>>> Office: 703-579-2727 >>>>>>> Cell: 703-625-1468 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> THIS COMMUNICATION MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR OTHERWISE >>>>>>> PROPRIETARY MATERIAL and is thus for use only by the intended >>>>>>> recipient. If you received this in error, please contact >>>> the sender >>>>>>> and delete the e-mail and its attachments from all computers. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>>> From: isapros-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> <isapros-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>>>>> To: isapros@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <isapros@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>>>>> Sent: Fri Jun 30 16:56:54 2006 >>>>>>> Subject: [isapros] Re: OT: The Most Powerful PC on the Planet! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Pass it around to share? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> John T >>>>>>> eServices For You >>>>>>> >>>>>>> "Seek, and ye shall find!" >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> WTF do I do now? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> . >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thoughts? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> t >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> > > >