[isapros] Re: OT: The Most Powerful PC on the Planet!

  • From: "Thor (Hammer of God)" <thor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: "isapros@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <isapros@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sun, 02 Jul 2006 12:02:26 -0700

Yes.


On 7/2/06 6:06 AM, "Thomas W Shinder" <tshinder@xxxxxxxxxxx> spoketh to all:

> Are they are primary partitions?
> 
> Thomas W Shinder, M.D.
> Site: www.isaserver.org
> Blog: http://blogs.isaserver.org/shinder/
> Book: http://tinyurl.com/3xqb7
> MVP -- ISA Firewalls
> 
>  
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: isapros-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> [mailto:isapros-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Thor
>> (Hammer of God)
>> Sent: Saturday, July 01, 2006 1:22 PM
>> To: isapros@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: [isapros] Re: OT: The Most Powerful PC on the Planet!
>> 
>> 
>> Well, I'm about to dive in and see how well it goes.  Should
>> be interesting
>> have "Server" as my client OS ;)  Too bad you can't upgrade
>> from XP Pro to
>> Server... That would have made the testing a bit easier.
>> 
>> Anyone else have issues when doing multiple boots with
>> multiple SATA/SATA2
>> drives?  No matter what drives/partitions I choose to install
>> a new OS on a
>> different partition, the modified boot.ini always uses a
>> signature() in the
>> boot path rather than the multi() syntax, and it never boots into the
>> install bits.  Manually changing the path to specifying the proper
>> drive/partition works to boot into the install, but I always
>> get the dreaded
>> x7b stop error after that.  This is true regardless of the
>> Win OS being
>> installed and probably due to bad mojo on the references to
>> the sys drivers.
>> 
>> I actually have to disconnect all my other drives to get a
>> "clean" install,
>> at which point I go and edit the boot.ini on my original C:
>> to boot into the
>> OS.  That works fine, but doing it that way makes me feel
>> like I'm sportin'
>> a shanker.
>> 
>> t
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On 7/1/06 7:11 AM, "Thomas W Shinder" <tshinder@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> spoketh to all:
>> 
>>> Yep, looks like that's where I'm going too. I'm tired of waiting for
>>> these VMs to sure a lousy 4GB memory and two procs.
>>> 
>>> Thomas W Shinder, M.D.
>>> Site: www.isaserver.org
>>> Blog: http://blogs.isaserver.org/shinder/
>>> Book: http://tinyurl.com/3xqb7
>>> MVP -- ISA Firewalls
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: isapros-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> [mailto:isapros-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Thor
>>>> (Hammer of God)
>>>> Sent: Friday, June 30, 2006 6:50 PM
>>>> To: isapros@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> Subject: [isapros] Re: OT: The Most Powerful PC on the Planet!
>>>> 
>>>> Then I'll still be in the "no drivers, limited software"
>>>> environment. Looks
>>>> like there won't be any perceivable (or real, for that
>>>> matter) performance
>>>> difference between the two, yet I'll get full memory support and my
>>>> preferred environment out of x32 Ent.
>>>> 
>>>> I'll just have to see how the drivers go...
>>>> 
>>>> Stay tuned!
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On 6/30/06 3:19 PM, "Steve Moffat" <steve@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> spoketh to all:
>>>> 
>>>>> What about Ent 64 bit?
>>>>> 
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: isapros-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> [mailto:isapros-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
>>>>> On Behalf Of Thor (Hammer of God)
>>>>> Sent: Friday, June 30, 2006 7:08 PM
>>>>> To: isapros@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; Thor; Young, Gerald G
>>>>> Subject: [isapros] Re: OT: The Most Powerful PC on the Planet!
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> http://news.softpedia.com/news/Windows-versus-Windows-or-32-bi
>>>> t-versus-6
>>>>> 4bit
>>>>> -1349.shtml
>>>>> 
>>>>> This is an interesting benchmark test between x32 and x64
>>>> bit.  I may be
>>>>> stuck in "x64 is way mo betta" for no reason.  From a speed
>>>> standpoint,
>>>>> anyway...
>>>>> 
>>>>> So, Ent Ed on this guy might actually be the way to go.
>> And in all
>>>>> actuality, I wouldn't really need to worry about loading
>>>> virtual server
>>>>> on it anyway, as I would just load everything into that instance.
>>>>> 
>>>>> I'll see if everything loads properly... Good call Gerald. Thanks.
>>>>> 
>>>>> t
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> On 6/30/06 2:36 PM, "Thor (Hammer of God)" <thor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> spoketh to
>>>>> all:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Now that's an interesting idea... Load Enterprise Ed of
>>>> Win2k3 to take
>>>>> 
>>>>>> advantage of all the RAM while still being able to have the full
>>>>>> experience of sound, preferred apps, video preferences,  etc.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> So, I'd loose the x64 environment, but keep all the goodies while
>>>>>> still using Virtual Server the way I want to.  Plus have
>>>> the benefits
>>>>>> of having "Server" running.  Hmmm.  Not bad.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> So the question now becomes, "how much faster is x64 than x32?"
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Anyone?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> t
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On 6/30/06 2:24 PM, "Young, Gerald G" <Gerald.Young@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>> spoketh to
>>>>>> all:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> FedEx it to me?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Put *nix on it and try to get wine to work with your
>> Window apps?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Try Vista, which may or may not support 8 GB of memory (can't
>>>>> remember).
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Use W2K3 Enterprise (x32) and keep most, if not all other
>>>>>>> functionality?  The server OS is a pretty stable game
>>>> platform since
>>>>>>> almost all XP drivers work on it (or at least they have for me).
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Enterprise shouldn't set you back too far since you can
>>>> afford that
>>>>>>> beast of a rig you got. :)
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> You could also take up the hobby of 3D rendering or graphical
>>>>>>> editing, if they aren't already hobbies of yours.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> You could also probably put that puppy to work with the
>>>> SETI screen
>>>>> saver.
>>>>>>> Who knows, you might actually find THE signal. :)
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> While I'm envious (from a gaming perspective) I look at buying
>>>>>>> something like that akin to buying a mansion to live in
>>>> when you're
>>>>>>> single.  What ARE you going to do with it? :)
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Not to mention, can you imagine cleaning a mansion by yourself?!
>>>>>>> Cordially yours,
>>>>>>> Jerry G. Young II +From Blackberry+
>>>>>>>   MCSE (4.0/W2K)
>>>>>>> Atlanta EES Implementation Team Lead
>>>>>>> ECNS Microsoft Engineering
>>>>>>> Unisys
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 11493 Sunset Hills Rd.
>>>>>>> Reston, VA 20190
>>>>>>> Office: 703-579-2727
>>>>>>> Cell: 703-625-1468
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> THIS COMMUNICATION MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR OTHERWISE
>>>>>>> PROPRIETARY MATERIAL and is thus for use only by the intended
>>>>>>> recipient. If you received this in error, please contact
>>>> the sender
>>>>>>> and delete the e-mail and its attachments from all computers.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>>> From: isapros-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> <isapros-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>>> To: isapros@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <isapros@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>>> Sent: Fri Jun 30 16:56:54 2006
>>>>>>> Subject: [isapros] Re: OT: The Most Powerful PC on the Planet!
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Pass it around to share?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> John T
>>>>>>> eServices For You
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> "Seek, and ye shall find!"
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> WTF do I do now?
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Thoughts?
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> t
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> 



Other related posts: