[isapros] Re: ISA Firewalls Now Support Outobund SSL Tunnel Inspection!
- From: "Jim Harrison" <Jim@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <isapros@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 24 Jun 2006 10:25:03 -0700
sorry - wrong thread.
I was referring to your comment on Steve's blog to your blog on Steve's "ISA +
domain == bad" statement during Tech Ed.
________________________________
From: isapros-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx on behalf of Thomas W Shinder
Sent: Sat 6/24/2006 9:49 AM
To: isapros@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [isapros] Re: ISA Firewalls Now Support Outobund SSL Tunnel
Inspection!
Where? What did he say?
________________________________
From: isapros-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx on behalf of Jim Harrison
Sent: Sat 6/24/2006 11:14 AM
To: isapros@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [isapros] Re: ISA Firewalls Now Support Outobund SSL Tunnel
Inspection!
Holy 541t!
TSu actually responded (in standard circular style) to Tom's response...
It makes for some funny reading.
________________________________
From: isapros-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx on behalf of Thomas W Shinder
Sent: Tue 6/20/2006 7:56 PM
To: isapros@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [isapros] Re: ISA Firewalls Now Support Outobund SSL Tunnel Inspection!
Hi Amy,
I joined ISAserver.org January 9, 2001.
Between then and now there have been 1988 days.
40,000/1988 = 20.12 post/day
There have been about 47712 hours since then.
40000/47712 = .838 posts/hour or about 1 per hour for every day in the last 5
years, 5 months, and 11 days.
And that doesn't include the mailing list, the newsgroups, or the private
emails I receive with questions.
I think only Jim Harrison could beat that number. You don't see it in public,
but Jim is amazingly prolific on the internal Microsoft isaqa mail alias and
other internal mailing lists.
:-))
Tom
Thomas W Shinder, M.D.
Site: www.isaserver.org <http://www.isaserver.org/>
Blog: http://blogs.isaserver.org/shinder/
Book: http://tinyurl.com/3xqb7 <http://tinyurl.com/3xqb7>
MVP -- ISA Firewalls
________________________________
From: isapros-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:isapros-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Amy Babinchak
Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2006 9:48 PM
To: isapros@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [isapros] Re: ISA Firewalls Now Support Outobund SSL Tunnel
Inspection!
40,000 posts? Break that down for us. How many per year/month/day does
that amount to?
________________________________
From: isapros-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:isapros-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Thomas W Shinder
Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2006 10:46 PM
To: isapros@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [isapros] Re: ISA Firewalls Now Support Outobund SSL Tunnel
Inspection!
Hey guys,
I just tested Clear Tunnel and it works a treat! Caches the SSL content
too. RTM will allow you to create exceptions if you like.
Now I know that anyone who pays through the nose for Blue Coat needs
some serious medical assistance! :))
You guys really should register for the beta. This really puts the
level of security the ISA firewall has over PIX WAY over the top, and it puts a
serious dent in the Check Point armor as well.
Tom
Thomas W Shinder, M.D.
Site: www.isaserver.org <http://www.isaserver.org/>
Blog: http://blogs.isaserver.org/shinder/
Book: http://tinyurl.com/3xqb7
MVP -- ISA Firewalls
________________________________
From: isapros-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:isapros-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Thomas W Shinder
Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2006 7:22 PM
To: isalist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: isapros@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [isapros] ISA Firewalls Now Support Outobund SSL
Tunnel Inspection!
Thomas Shinder Blog: http://blogs.isaserver.org/shinder/
All mail to and from this domain is GFI-scanned.
Other related posts:
